Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499947›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2020

An observational field study of the cloacal microbiota in adult laying hens with and without access to an outdoor range.

Janneke Schreuder, Francisca C Velkers, Ruth J Bouwstra, Nancy Beerens, J Arjan Stegeman, Willem F de Boer, P van Hooft, Armin R W Elbers, Alex Bossers, Stephanie D Jurburg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Janneke SchreuderFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department Population Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 7, 3584, CL, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.schreuder@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0002-3053
Francisca C VelkersFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department Population Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 7, 3584, CL, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ruth J BouwstraGD Animal Health, Deventer, the Netherlands.
Nancy BeerensDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
J Arjan StegemanFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department Population Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 7, 3584, CL, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Willem F de BoerWildlife Ecology and Conservation Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
P van HooftWildlife Ecology and Conservation Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Armin R W ElbersDepartment of Bacteriology and Epidemiology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Alex BossersDepartment of Infection Biology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Stephanie D JurburgDepartment of Infection Biology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLUtrecht University · NLDe Gezondheidsdienst voor Dieren · NLGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research · DE

Funding

1Health4Food TKI-AF-15225German Research Foundation FZT 118Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit KB-37-003-013Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit WOT-01-003-085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaying hens with access to outdoor ranges are exposed to additional environmental factors and microorganisms, including potential pathogens. Differences in composition of the cloacal microbial community between indoor- and outdoor-housed layers may serve as an indicator for exposure to the outdoor environment, including its pathogens, and may yield insights into factors affecting the chickens' microbiota community dynamics. However, little is known about the influence of outdoor housing on microbiota community composition in commercial layer flocks. We performed a cross-sectional field study to evaluate differences in the cloacal microbiota of indoor- vs outdoor-layers across farms. Eight layer flocks (four indoor, four outdoor) from five commercial poultry farms were sampled. Indoor and outdoor flocks with the same rearing flock of origin, age, and breed were selected. In each flock, cloacal swabs were taken from ten layers, and microbiota were analysed with 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.

resultsHousing type (indoor vs outdoor), rearing farm, farm and poultry house within the farm all significantly contributed to bacterial community composition. Poultry house explained most of the variation (20.9%), while housing type only explained 0.2% of the variation in community composition. Bacterial diversity was higher in indoor-layers than in outdoor-layers, and indoor-layers also had more variation in their bacterial community composition. No phyla or genera were found to be differentially abundant between indoor and outdoor poultry houses. One amplicon sequence variant was exclusively present in outdoor-layers across all outdoor poultry houses, and was identified as Dietzia maris.

conclusionsThis study shows that exposure to an outdoor environment is responsible for a relatively small proportion of the community variation in the microbiota of layers. The poultry house, farm, and rearing flock play a much greater role in determining the cloacal microbiota composition of adult laying hens. Overall, measuring differences in cloacal microbiota of layers as an indicator for the level of exposure to potential pathogens and biosecurity seems of limited practical use. To gain more insight into environmental drivers of the gut microbiota, future research should aim at investigating community composition of commercial layer flocks over time.

Indexed as

16S rRNALaying henMicrobiotaOutdoor rangePoultry

Identifiers

PMID33499947
PMCPMC7807755
OpenAlexW3047881478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.