ArticleAnimal microbiome2019
Looking like the locals - gut microbiome changes post-release in an endangered species.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut Microbiota Differences in Wild Asian Elephants From Pu'er, China.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Characterization of gut microbiota in wild Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) from five forests across Thailand.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Gut Microbiome Communities Vary Across Translocated Populations of the Seychelles Warbler.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Effects of environmental setting and diet on the gut microbial ecology of eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis).Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Characterising the gut microbiome of six Australian marsupials reveals captivity constrains microbiome.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Microbes first into the life rafts: preserving microbiomes to secure health in degrading ecosystems.Sustainable microbiology · 2026Article
- A Preliminary Investigation of the Gastrointestinal Bacterial Microbiomes of Barred Owls (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Endangered Deep-Snow Mountain Caribou Have a Distinct Winter Diet and Gut Microbiome That May Be Altered by Maternal Penning.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Range-Wide Assessment of the Tasmanian Devil Gut Microbiome.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Multi-Omics Analysis of Gut Microbiome and Host Metabolism in Different Populations of Chinese Alligators (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Social organization and physical environment shape the microbiome of harvester ants.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Comparative assessment of Texas horned lizard (Frontiers in microbiomes · 2025Article
- Pre-release environmental acclimation enhances wild adaptability of endangered Kaluga sturgeon (Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Host dispersal relaxes selective pressures in rafting microbiomes and triggers successional changes.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Location Matters: Variations in Cloacal Microbiota Composition of Spatially Separated Freshwater Turtles.Microbial ecology · 2024Article
- MakingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Gut Microbiome Profiling of the Endangered Southern Greater Glider (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Captivity, Reintroductions, and the Rewilding of Amphibian-associated Bacterial Communities.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Wild Avian Gut Microbiome at a Small Spatial Scale: A Study from a Mediterranean Island Population ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Bifidobacteria define gut microbiome profiles of golden lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia) and marmoset (Callithrix sp.) metagenomic shotgun pools.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCaptivity presents extreme lifestyle changes relative to the wild, and evidence of microbiome dysbiosis in captive animals is growing. The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in host health. Whilst captive breeding and subsequent reintroduction to the wild is important for conservation, such efforts often have limited success. Post-release monitoring is essential for assessing translocation success, but changes to the microbiome of released individuals are poorly understood. The Tasmanian devil was previously shown to exhibit loss of microbiome diversity as a result of intense captive management. This current study examines changes in the devil gut microbiome in response to translocation and aims to determine if perturbations from captivity are permanent or reversible.
methodsUsing 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, we conducted temporal monitoring of the gut microbiome of released devils during two translocation events, captive-to-wild and wild-to-wild. To investigate whether the microbiome of the released devils changed following translocation, we characterized their microbiome at multiple time points during the translocation process over the course of 6-12 months and compared them to the microbiome of wild incumbent devils (resident wild-born devils at the respective release sites).
resultsWe showed that the pre-release microbiome was significantly different to the microbiome of wild incumbent animals, but that the microbiomes of animals post-release (as early as 3 to 4 weeks post-release) were similar to wild incumbents. The gut microbiome of released animals showed significant compositional shifts toward the wild incumbent microbiome of both translocation events.
conclusionOur results suggest that the devil gut microbiome is dynamic and that loss of microbiome diversity in captivity can be restored following release to the wild. We recommend the broader application of microbiome monitoring in wildlife translocation programs to assess the impacts of translocation on animal microbiomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.