Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499871›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2021

Wild food plants and fungi sold in the markets of Luang Prabang, Lao PDR.

Łukasz Łuczaj, Vichith Lamxay, Khamphart Tongchan, Kosonh Xayphakatsa, Kongchay Phimmakong, Somphavanh Radavanh, Villapone Kanyasone, Marcin Pietras, Małgorzata Karbarz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Termite Mushrooms (Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ethnobotanical study of wild edible fruits in eastern Bhutan.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Łukasz ŁuczajInstitute of Biology and Biotechnology, ul. Pigonia 1, 35-310, Rzeszów, Poland. lukasz.luczaj@interia.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5272-4826
Vichith LamxayDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, National University of Laos, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic.
Khamphart TongchanPha Tad Ke Botanical Garden, Ban Wat That, PO Box 959, 06000, Luang Prabang, Lao People's Democratic Republic.
Kosonh XayphakatsaBiotechnology and Ecology Institute, Ministry of Science and Technology, Doon Teaw Village, Km 14 Office, Thangon Road, Xaythany District, PO Box 2279, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic.
Kongchay PhimmakongDepartment of Science, Ministry of Science and Technology, Doon Teaw, Km 14, Thangon Road, Xaythany District, PO Box 2279, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic.
Somphavanh RadavanhBiotechnology and Ecology Institute, Ministry of Science and Technology, Doon Teaw Village, Km 14 Office, Thangon Road, Xaythany District, PO Box 2279, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic.
Villapone KanyasoneDepartment of Science and Technology, Luang Prabang, Lao People's Democratic Republic.
Marcin PietrasInstitute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Parkowa 5, 62-035, Kórnik, Poland.
Małgorzata KarbarzInstitute of Biology and Biotechnology, ul. Pigonia 1, 35-310, Rzeszów, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpen air markets hold an important position for ethnobiologists. In Southeast Asia, they are seriously understudied, in spite of their incredible biocultural diversity. In order to fill this gap we recorded plants and fungi sold in the open air markets of Luang Prabang, Lao PDR.

methodsThe markets were visited 38 times in four seasons: the dry season, early monsoon, mid-monsoon, and end-of-monsoon, at least 8 times per season. All items were photographed and voucher specimens were collected. Fungi were identified using DNA barcoding techniques.

resultsWe recorded 110 species of wild edible plants and 54 species of fungi, including 49 wild-collected species. The sold plants included 86 species of green vegetables, 18 species of fruits and 3 species of flowers. Products from woody species constitute around half of all taxa sold. These include the young shoots of tree leaves, which are used for salads-an interesting feature of Lao cuisine. A large number of extremely rare Russula, with no reference sequences represented in databases or even species unknown to science is present on sale in the markets.

conclusionsLuang Prabang markets are some of the richest in species of wild edible plants and fungi in Asia, and indeed in the whole world. It is worth pointing out the exceptionally long list of wild edible mushrooms which are sold in Luang Prabang (and probably elsewhere in Laos). We view the Morning Market of Luang Prabang as a cultural treasure that unites the traditions of eating a large number of living species with very diverse flora and fauna. Measures should be taken to strike a balance between local foraging traditions and nature conservation priorities.

Indexed as

CommerceAgaricalesFlowersFruitLaosPlants, EdibleVegetablesEdible mushroomsEthnobotanyEthnomycologyMekong regionWild edible plantsWild vegetables

Identifiers

PMID33499871
PMCPMC7835671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.