Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499868›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Capacity building of health care professionals to perform interprofessional management of non-communicable diseases in primary care - experiences from Ukraine.

Tiina Laatikainen, Anastasiya Dumcheva, Tetiana Kiriazova, Oleksandr Zeziulin, Laura Inglin, Dylan Collins, Jill Farrington

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Tiina LaatikainenInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. tiina.laatikainen@thl.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-4782
Anastasiya DumchevaMinistry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Tetiana KiriazovaUkrainian Institute on Public Health Policy, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Oleksandr ZeziulinUkrainian Institute on Public Health Policy, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Laura InglinInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Dylan CollinsUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Jill FarringtonWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ukrainian Institute of Public Health Policy · UAUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIMinistry of Health · UAUniversity of British Columbia · CAWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe · DK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-communicable diseases are leading causes of death and disability across the world. Countries with the highest non-communicable disease (NCD) burden in the WHO European Region are often those that have some of the greatest health system challenges for achieving good outcomes in prevention and care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an interprofessional capacity building intervention carried out in Ukraine to improve the management non-communicable diseases in primary health care.

methodsA mixed-methods evaluation study was performed in 2018 to analyse the effect of a capacity building intervention carried out for over 10,000 primary care professionals in Ukraine in 2018. Quantitative data were collected from primary health care records of intervention and control areas preceding the intervention and 1.5 to 2 years after the intervention. Altogether 2798 patient records before and 2795 after the intervention were reviewed. In control areas, 1202 patient records were reviewed. Qualitative data were collected carrying out focus group interviews for health professionals, clinic managers and patients. Also, observations of clinical practice and patient pathways were performed.

resultsThe capacity building intervention improved the capacity of professionals in detection and management of non-communicable disease risk factors. Significant improvement was seen in detection rates of both behavioural and biological risk factors and in medication prescription rates in the intervention areas. However, almost similar improvement in prescription rates was also observed in control clinics. Improvements in control of blood pressure, blood glucose and cholesterol were not seen during the evaluated implementation period. Qualitative analyses highlighted the improved knowledge and skills but challenges in changing the current practice.

conclusionsA large scale capacity building intervention improved primary health care professionals' knowledge, skills and clinical practice on NCD risk detection and reduction. We were not able to detect improvements in treatment outcomes - at least within 1.5 to 2 years follow-up. Improvement of treatment outcomes would most likely need more comprehensive systems change.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingPrimary Health CareFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansNoncommunicable DiseasesUkraineDisease managementInterventionNon-communicable diseasesPrimary health careQuality improvementTotal risk assessmentTrainingTreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID33499868
PMCPMC7839221
OpenAlexW3122595978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.