Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499862›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2021

Putative ligand binding sites of two functionally characterized bark beetle odorant receptors.

Jothi K Yuvaraj, Rebecca E Roberts, Yonathan Sonntag, Xiao-Qing Hou, Ewald Grosse-Wilde, Aleš Machara, Dan-Dan Zhang, Bill S Hansson, Urban Johanson, Christer Löfstedt and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Accelerating Ligand Discovery for Insect Odorant Receptors.International journal of biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. TBM preferred to AlphaFold 3 for functional models of insect odorant receptors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antenna-Biased Odorant Receptor PstrOR17 Mediates Attraction ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jothi K Yuvaraj *Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Rebecca E Roberts *Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Yonathan SonntagDivision of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Xiao-Qing HouDepartment of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Ewald Grosse-WildeDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Aleš MacharaInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Gilead Sciences and IOCB Research Center, Flemingovo n. 2, 166 10, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Dan-Dan ZhangDepartment of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Bill S HanssonDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Urban JohansonDivision of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Christer LöfstedtDepartment of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Martin N AnderssonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden. martin_n.andersson@biol.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-9807-8524
Lund University · SECzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry · CZCzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DE

Funding

Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning CTS 17:25Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2018-01444Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 217-2014-689Vetenskapsrådet 2017-03804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBark beetles are major pests of conifer forests, and their behavior is primarily mediated via olfaction. Targeting the odorant receptors (ORs) may thus provide avenues towards improved pest control. Such an approach requires information on the function of ORs and their interactions with ligands, which is also essential for understanding the functional evolution of these receptors. Hence, we aimed to identify a high-quality complement of ORs from the destructive spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) and analyze their antennal expression and phylogenetic relationships with ORs from other beetles. Using 68 biologically relevant test compounds, we next aimed to functionally characterize ecologically important ORs, using two systems for heterologous expression. Our final aim was to gain insight into the ligand-OR interaction of the functionally characterized ORs, using a combination of computational and experimental methods.

resultsWe annotated 73 ORs from an antennal transcriptome of I. typographus and report the functional characterization of two ORs (ItypOR46 and ItypOR49), which are responsive to single enantiomers of the common bark beetle pheromone compounds ipsenol and ipsdienol, respectively. Their responses and antennal expression correlate with the specificities, localizations, and/or abundances of olfactory sensory neurons detecting these enantiomers. We use homology modeling and molecular docking to predict their binding sites. Our models reveal a likely binding cleft lined with residues that previously have been shown to affect the responses of insect ORs. Within this cleft, the active ligands are predicted to specifically interact with residues Tyr84 and Thr205 in ItypOR46. The suggested importance of these residues in the activation by ipsenol is experimentally supported through site-directed mutagenesis and functional testing, and hydrogen bonding appears key in pheromone binding.

conclusionsThe emerging insight into ligand binding in the two characterized ItypORs has a general importance for our understanding of the molecular and functional evolution of the insect OR gene family. Due to the ecological importance of the characterized receptors and widespread use of ipsenol and ipsdienol in bark beetle chemical communication, these ORs should be evaluated for their potential use in pest control and biosensors to detect bark beetle infestations.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesFemaleInsect ProteinsLigandsMaleReceptors, OdorantWeevilsInsect ProteinsLigandsReceptors, OdorantDeorphanizationFunctional evolutionHEK293 cellsOdorant receptorPest insectPheromone receptorXenopus oocyte

Identifiers

PMID33499862
PMCPMC7836466
OpenAlexW3125345361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.