ArticleBMC biology2021
Putative ligand binding sites of two functionally characterized bark beetle odorant receptors.
Article in BMC biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural characterization of representative odorant receptors in Rhynchophorus ferrugineus through high-throughput modelling and extended molecular dynamics simulations.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Deorphanization of the odorant receptor CsepOR1 identifies a biphasic behavioral modulator in Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae).Pest management science · 2026Article
- A Highly Expressed Odorant Receptor Detects the Aggregation Pheromone Rhynchophorol in the Invasive American Palm Weevil.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- Highly Expressed Odorant Receptor Orthologs Detect the Aggregation Pheromone Lineatin in Trypodendron Ambrosia Beetles.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Article
- Transcriptome Analysis and Identification of Chemosensory Membrane Proteins in the Head ofInsects · 2025Article
- Article
- Insight into the Relationships Between Chemical, Protein and Functional Variables in the PBP/GOBP Family in Moths Based on Machine Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Functional Characterization of a Female-Biased Chemoreceptor of the Codling Moth (Cydia pomonella) Responding to Aldehydes and Other Volatile Compounds.Journal of chemical ecology · 2025Article
- Accelerating Ligand Discovery for Insect Odorant Receptors.International journal of biological sciences · 2025Article
- TBM preferred to AlphaFold 3 for functional models of insect odorant receptors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Complex Genomic Landscape of Inversion Polymorphism in Europe's Most Destructive Forest Pest.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Template-based modeling of insect odorant receptors outperforms AlphaFold3 for ligand binding predictions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Eurasian spruce bark beetle detects lanierone using a highly expressed specialist odorant receptor, present in several functional sensillum types.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Functional Characterization Supports Multiple Evolutionary Origins of Pheromone Receptors in Bark Beetles.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Antennal Transcriptome Screening and Identification of Chemosensory Proteins in the Double-Spine European Spruce Bark Beetle,International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Few chemoreceptor genes in the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum may reflect its specialized ecology.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Antenna-Biased Odorant Receptor PstrOR17 Mediates Attraction ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A conserved pheromone receptor in the American and the Asian palm weevils is also activated by host plant volatiles.Current research in insect science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBark beetles are major pests of conifer forests, and their behavior is primarily mediated via olfaction. Targeting the odorant receptors (ORs) may thus provide avenues towards improved pest control. Such an approach requires information on the function of ORs and their interactions with ligands, which is also essential for understanding the functional evolution of these receptors. Hence, we aimed to identify a high-quality complement of ORs from the destructive spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) and analyze their antennal expression and phylogenetic relationships with ORs from other beetles. Using 68 biologically relevant test compounds, we next aimed to functionally characterize ecologically important ORs, using two systems for heterologous expression. Our final aim was to gain insight into the ligand-OR interaction of the functionally characterized ORs, using a combination of computational and experimental methods.
resultsWe annotated 73 ORs from an antennal transcriptome of I. typographus and report the functional characterization of two ORs (ItypOR46 and ItypOR49), which are responsive to single enantiomers of the common bark beetle pheromone compounds ipsenol and ipsdienol, respectively. Their responses and antennal expression correlate with the specificities, localizations, and/or abundances of olfactory sensory neurons detecting these enantiomers. We use homology modeling and molecular docking to predict their binding sites. Our models reveal a likely binding cleft lined with residues that previously have been shown to affect the responses of insect ORs. Within this cleft, the active ligands are predicted to specifically interact with residues Tyr84 and Thr205 in ItypOR46. The suggested importance of these residues in the activation by ipsenol is experimentally supported through site-directed mutagenesis and functional testing, and hydrogen bonding appears key in pheromone binding.
conclusionsThe emerging insight into ligand binding in the two characterized ItypORs has a general importance for our understanding of the molecular and functional evolution of the insect OR gene family. Due to the ecological importance of the characterized receptors and widespread use of ipsenol and ipsdienol in bark beetle chemical communication, these ORs should be evaluated for their potential use in pest control and biosensors to detect bark beetle infestations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.