Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499824›Full record

ReviewBMC family practice2021

Construction of a patient decision aid for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care.

Yves-Marie Vincent, Adèle Frachon, Clotilde Buffeteau, Guillaume Conort

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05847036 (Profiles of Urinary Tract Infections in General Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05847036 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Profiles of Urinary Tract Infections in General Practice : a Prospective Multicentre Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCNGE ConseilRan2023 to 2025Enrolled500ConditionsUrinary Tract Infections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Women's Experiences of Recurrent UTIs: A Qualitative Study of Preventive Management and Decision Support Needs.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. State-of-the-Art Review: Recurrent Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yves-Marie VincentDépartement de Médecine Générale, Université de Bordeaux, Collège Sciences de la santé, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France. vincent.yvesmarie@u-bordeaux.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-5716-6931
Adèle FrachonDépartement de Médecine Générale, Université de Bordeaux, Collège Sciences de la santé, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Clotilde BuffeteauDépartement de Médecine Générale, Université de Bordeaux, Collège Sciences de la santé, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Guillaume ConortDépartement de Médecine Générale, Université de Bordeaux, Collège Sciences de la santé, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Université de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) is very common among women in primary care. The risk of developing pyelonephritis remains low after uUTI, nonetheless, empiric antibiotic therapy is frequently prescribed for symptomatic purposes. This may lead to adverse effects and antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, patients may express the will to limit the use of antibiotics. Some European countries recommend discussing a delayed prescription with the patient and developing a shared decision. The aim of this study is to create a patient decision aid (PtDA) used in primary care settings to make a shared decision between practitioners and women about whether or not to treat uUTI with antibiotics.

methodsWe followed the steps recommended by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, with a scoping phase, a design phase (including focus groups and literature review), and an alpha-testing phase. A steering group, made of patients and physicians, met throughout the study to develop a prototype PtDA.

resultsThe information included in the PtDA is the definition of uUTI, information on the options, their benefits, risks, and consequences, based on a review of the literature. The results of the focus group made possible to determine the patient's values and preferences to consider in decision-making, including: the discomfort felt, the impact on daily life, patients' perceptions of antibiotics, and the position relative to the risk of adverse effect. The choices in presentation, organisation and design are the result of the work of the steering group, improved by feedback from alpha testing. We confirmed the need for shared decision-making and the equipoise in this situation.

conclusionsWe developed a PtDA to be used in primary care for sharing decision on the use of antibiotic in uUTI. It needs to be validated in a beta-testing phase, with complementary advice from peers, and then tested in a clinical study comparing its use with the systematic prescription approach.

Indexed as

Urinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDecision Making, SharedDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansPrimary Health CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticCystitisFocus groupPatient-centred carePatient decision aidPrimary careShared decision-makingUncomplicated urinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID33499824
PMCPMC7839208
OpenAlexW3114174800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.