Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499790›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Biomechanical analyses of Cambrian euarthropod limbs reveal their effectiveness in mastication and durophagy.

Russell D C Bicknell, James D Holmes, Gregory D Edgecombe, Sarah R Losso, Javier Ortega-Hernández, Stephen Wroe, John R Paterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Raptorial appendages of the Cambrian apex predatorProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Three-dimensional morphology of the biramous appendages inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Before trilobite legs:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Russell D C BicknellPalaeoscience Research Centre, School of Environmental & Rural Science University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
James D HolmesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Gregory D EdgecombeDepartment of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Sarah R LossoMuseum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Javier Ortega-HernándezMuseum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Stephen WroePalaeoscience Research Centre, School of Environmental & Rural Science University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
John R PatersonPalaeoscience Research Centre, School of Environmental & Rural Science University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Durophagy arose in the Cambrian and greatly influenced the diversification of biomineralized defensive structures throughout the Phanerozoic. Spinose gnathobases on protopodites of Cambrian euarthropod limbs are considered key innovations for shell-crushing, yet few studies have demonstrated their effectiveness with biomechanical models. Here we present finite-element analysis models of two Cambrian trilobites with prominent gnathobases-

Indexed as

ArthropodsFossilsAnimalsBiological EvolutionEcosystemExtremitiesMasticationdurophagyEuarthropodafinite-element analysispredationtrilobitesxiphosurid

Identifiers

PMID33499790
PMCPMC7893260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.