Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499767›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2021

Do human butchery patterns exist? A study of the interaction of randomness and channelling in the distribution of cut marks on long bones.

Marcos Pizarro-Monzo, Mary E Prendergast, Agness O Gidna, Enrique Baquedano, Rocio Mora, Diego Gonzalez-Aguilera, Miguel A Mate-Gonzalez, Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcos Pizarro-MonzoInstitute of Evolution in Africa (IDEA), Alcalá University, Covarrubias 36, 28010 Madrid, Spain.
Mary E PrendergastDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Saint Louis University, 28003 Madrid, Spain.
Agness O GidnaPaleontology Unit, National Museum of Tanzania in Dar es Salaam, Robert Shaban Street, PO Box 511, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Enrique BaquedanoInstitute of Evolution in Africa (IDEA), Alcalá University, Covarrubias 36, 28010 Madrid, Spain.
Rocio MoraDepartment of Cartographic and Land Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School of Avila, University of Salamanca, Hornos Caleros 50, 05003 Ávila, Spain.
Diego Gonzalez-AguileraDepartment of Cartographic and Land Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School of Avila, University of Salamanca, Hornos Caleros 50, 05003 Ávila, Spain.
Miguel A Mate-GonzalezDepartment of Cartographic and Land Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School of Avila, University of Salamanca, Hornos Caleros 50, 05003 Ávila, Spain.
Manuel Domínguez-RodrigoInstitute of Evolution in Africa (IDEA), Alcalá University, Covarrubias 36, 28010 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone surface modifications (BSMs) in faunal assemblages are frequently used to infer past agency and actions of hominins and carnivores, with implications for the emergence of key human behaviours. Patterning of BSMs has mostly been defined as a combination of the intensity of marks per bone portion and sometimes per element. Numerous variables involved in butchery can condition cut mark anatomical distribution, so much so that these variables are widely assumed to be stochastic. Here, we present a new methodological approach using a novel geospatial tool (Ikhnos) which combines the three-dimensional spatial documentation of cut mark patterns with spatial statistics based on wavelets, applied to three experimental and ethnoarchaeological faunal assemblages. We use wavelets to identify patterning of multiple longitudinal series of cut mark distributions on bones, and to establish similarities or differences in patterning within and across different assemblages. This method demonstrates the existence of general and behaviour-specific butchery patterns. It can also be used to effectively assess the proportion of mark clustering that is due to randomness, versus that which is conditioned by the butchery process.

Indexed as

FossilsHominidaeAnimalsBone and BonesHumansbone surface modificationbutcherycut marksgeospatial analysistaphonomywavelet

Identifiers

PMID33499767
PMCPMC7879749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.