Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499499›Full record

ReviewMilitary medicine2021

Recent Progress in Animal Studies of the Skin- and Bone-integrated Pylon With Deep Porosity for Bone-Anchored Limb Prosthetics With and Without Neural Interface.

Mark Pitkin, Charles Cassidy, Maxim A Shevtsov, Joshua R Jarrell, Hangue Park, Brad J Farrell, John F Dalton, W Lee Childers, Robert S Kistenberg, Kyunggeune Oh and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Military medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Optimising soft tissue in-growthBiomaterials translational · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark PitkinPoly-Orth International, Sharon, MA, 02067, USA.
Charles CassidyTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Maxim A ShevtsovCenter of Cell Technologies, Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Laboratory of Biomedical Nanotechnologies, Petersburg, 194064, Russia.
Joshua R JarrellSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Hangue ParkDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Brad J FarrellDepartment of Physical Therapy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30302, USA.
John F DaltonGeorgia Hand, Shoulder & Elbow, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA.
W Lee ChildersCenter for the Intrepid, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio, Ft. Sam Houston, TX, 78234, USA.
Robert S KistenbergSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Kyunggeune OhSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Alexander N KlishkoSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Boris I PrilutskySchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg · RUGeorgia State University · USJoint Base San Antonio · USTexas A&M University · USTufts University · US

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Pilot Supplement)UL1TR002544 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2018 to 2022
$50.2M
Validating establishment of functional safety in skin interface with deeply porous transcutaneous pylon for direct skeletal attachment of limb prosthesesR44AR079960 · NIAMS · POLY-ORTH INTERNATIONAL · PI PITKIN, MARK · 2021 to 2022
$1.7M
Large animal study on deeply porous transcutaneous pylon for direct skeletal attachmentR44HD090768 · NICHD · POLY-ORTH INTERNATIONAL · PI PITKIN, MARK · 2016 to 2017
$1.4M
3D-printed Skin and Bone Integrated Pylon (SBIP-3D) for Direct Skeletal Attachment of Limb Prostheses.SB1AR086711 · NIAMS · POLY-ORTH INTERNATIONAL · PI Mark Pitkin · 2025 to 2026
$1.1M
Manufacturing technology for skin integrated composite prosthetic pylonR44HD057492 · NICHD · POLY-ORTH INTERNATIONAL · PI PITKIN, MARK · 2009 to 2010
$750k
Manufacturing technology for skin integrated composite prosthetic pylonR43HD057492 · NICHD · POLY-ORTH INTERNATIONAL · PI PITKIN, MARK · 2007 to 2007
$97k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002544NIAMS NIH HHS R44 AR079960NIAMS NIH HHS SB1 AR086711NICHD NIH HHS R43 HD057492NICHD NIH HHS R44 HD057492NICHD NIH HHS R44 HD090768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe three major unresolved problems in bone-anchored limb prosthetics are stable, infection-free integration of skin with a percutaneous bone implant, robust skeletal fixation between the implant and host bone, and a secure interface of sensory nerves and muscles with a prosthesis for the intuitive bidirectional prosthetic control. Here we review results of our completed work and report on recent progress. MATERIALS AND

methodsEight female adult cats received skin- and bone-integrated pylon (SBIP) and eight male adult cats received SBIP-peripheral neural interface (PNI) pylon into the right distal tibia. The latter pylons provided PNI for connection between a powered sensing transtibial prosthesis and electrodes in residual soleus muscle and on residual distal tibial nerve. If signs of infection were absent 28-70 days after implantation, cats started wearing a passive prosthesis. We recorded and analyzed full-body mechanics of level and slope locomotion in five cats with passive prostheses and in one cat with a powered sensing prosthesis. We also performed histological analyses of tissue integration with the implants in nine cats. Four pigs received SBIPs into the left hindlimb and two pigs-into the left forelimb. We recorded vertical ground reaction forces before amputation and following osseointegration. We also conducted pullout postmortem tests on the implanted pylons. One pig received in dorsum the modified SBIPs with and without silver coating.

resultsSix cats from the SBIP groups had implant for 70 days. One cat developed infection and did not receive prosthesis. Five cats had pylon for 148 to 183 days, showed substantial loading of the prosthesis during locomotion (40.4% below presurgery control), and demonstrated deep ingrowth of skin and bone tissue into SBIP (over 60%). Seven of eight cats from the SBIP-PNI group demonstrated poor pylon integration without clinical signs of infection. One cat had prosthesis for 824 days (27 months). The use of the bidirectionally controlled prosthesis by this animal during level walking demonstrated increased vertical loading to nearly normal values, although the propulsion force was significantly reduced. From the study on pigs, it was found that symmetry in loading between the intact and prosthetic limbs during locomotion was 80 ± 5.5%. Skin-implant interface was infection-free, but developed a stoma, probably because of the high mobility of the skin and soft tissues in the pig's thigh. Dorsal implantation resulted in the infection-free deep ingrowth of skin into the SBIP implants.

conclusionsCats with SBIP (n = 5) and SBIP-PNI (n = 1) pylons developed a sound interface with the residuum skin and bone and demonstrated substantial loading of prosthetic limb during locomotion. One animal with SBIP developed infection and seven cats with SBIP-PNI demonstrated poor bone integration without signs of infection. Future studies of the SBIP-PNI should focus on reliability of integration with the residuum. Ongoing study with pigs requires decreasing the extra mobility of skin and soft tissues until the skin seal is developed within the SBIP implant.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesAnimalsArtificial LimbsOsseointegrationPorosityReproducibility of ResultsSwine

Identifiers

PMID33499499
PMCPMC7832823
OpenAlexW3121224489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.