Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33499052›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2021

Zebrafish Models of Cancer Therapy-Induced Cardiovascular Toxicity.

Sarah Lane, Luis Alberto More, Aarti Asnani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Emerging Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy for Cardiac Vascular Imaging in Zebrafish.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Disruption ofBioMed research international · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah LaneCardioVascular Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Luis Alberto MoreCardioVascular Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Aarti AsnaniCardioVascular Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4967-9918
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

CYP1 Inhibition as a New Therapeutic Strategy for Doxorubicin CardiomyopathyK08HL145019 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ASNANI, AARTI · 2019 to 2023
$837k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL145019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewBoth traditional and novel cancer therapies can cause cardiovascular toxicity in patients. In vivo models integrating both cardiovascular and cancer phenotypes allow for the study of on- and off-target mechanisms of toxicity arising from these agents. The zebrafish is the optimal whole organism model to screen for cardiotoxicity in a high throughput manner, while simultaneously assessing the role of cardiotoxicity pathways on the cancer therapy's antitumor effect. Here we highlight established zebrafish models of human cardiovascular disease and cancer, the unique advantages of zebrafish to study mechanisms of cancer therapy-associated cardiovascular toxicity, and finally, important limitations to consider when using the zebrafish to study toxicity. RECENT

findingsCancer therapy-associated cardiovascular toxicities range from cardiomyopathy with traditional agents to arrhythmias and thrombotic complications associated with newer targeted therapies. The zebrafish can be used to identify novel therapeutic strategies that selectively protect the heart from cancer therapy without affecting antitumor activity. Advances in genome editing technology have enabled the creation of several transgenic zebrafish lines valuable to the study of cardiovascular and cancer pathophysiology. SUMMARY: The high degree of genetic conservation between zebrafish and humans, as well as the ability to recapitulate cardiotoxic phenotypes observed in patients with cancer, make the zebrafish an effective model to study cancer therapy-associated cardiovascular toxicity. Though this model provides several key benefits over existing in vitro and in vivo models, limitations of the zebrafish model include the early developmental stage required for most high-throughput applications.

Indexed as

cancer therapycardiac developmentcardiovascular toxicityvascular developmentzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID33499052
PMCPMC7911266
OpenAlexW3124246457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.