Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33498953›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2021

Exercise Shifts Hypothetical Food Choices toward Greater Amounts and More Immediate Consumption.

Karsten Koehler, Safiya E Beckford, Elise Thayer, Alexandra R Martin, Julie B Boron, Jeffrey R Stevens

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karsten KoehlerDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 80992 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9618-2069
Safiya E BeckfordDepartment of Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Elise ThayerDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
Alexandra R MartinDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 80992 Munich, Germany.
Julie B BoronDepartment of Gerontology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, USA.
Jeffrey R StevensDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2375-1360

Funding

University of Nebraska Food for Health Collaboration Initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although exercise modulates appetite regulation and food intake, it remains poorly understood how exercise impacts decision-making about food. The purpose of the present study was to assess the impact of an acute exercise bout on hypothetical choices related to the amount and timing of food intake. Forty-one healthy participants (22.0 ± 2.6 years; 23.7 ± 2.5 kg/m

Indexed as

ExerciseFeeding BehaviorFood PreferencesPortion SizeAppetiteCross-Over StudiesEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultaerobic exercisecompensatory eatingfood amountfood choice

Identifiers

PMID33498953
PMCPMC7911174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.