Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33498905›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2021

Electrophysiology Read-Out Tools for Brain-on-Chip Biotechnology.

Csaba Forro, Davide Caron, Gian Nicola Angotzi, Vincenzo Gallo, Luca Berdondini, Francesca Santoro, Gemma Palazzolo, Gabriella Panuccio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Csaba ForroTissue Electronics, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Largo Barsanti e Matteucci, 53 - 80125 Napoli, Italy.
Davide CaronEnhanced Regenerative Medicine, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego, 30 - 16163 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4642-7125
Gian Nicola AngotziMicrotechnology for Neuroelectronics, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego, 30 - 16163 Genova, Italy.
Vincenzo GalloEnhanced Regenerative Medicine, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego, 30 - 16163 Genova, Italy.
Luca BerdondiniMicrotechnology for Neuroelectronics, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego, 30 - 16163 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9521-2812
Francesca SantoroTissue Electronics, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Largo Barsanti e Matteucci, 53 - 80125 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7323-9504
Gemma PalazzoloEnhanced Regenerative Medicine, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego, 30 - 16163 Genova, Italy.
Gabriella PanuccioEnhanced Regenerative Medicine, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego, 30 - 16163 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4059-7193

Funding

H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies 824164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-on-Chip (BoC) biotechnology is emerging as a promising tool for biomedical and pharmaceutical research applied to the neurosciences. At the convergence between lab-on-chip and cell biology, BoC couples in vitro three-dimensional brain-like systems to an engineered microfluidics platform designed to provide an in vivo-like extrinsic microenvironment with the aim of replicating tissue- or organ-level physiological functions. BoC therefore offers the advantage of an in vitro reproduction of brain structures that is more faithful to the native correlate than what is obtained with conventional cell culture techniques. As brain function ultimately results in the generation of electrical signals, electrophysiology techniques are paramount for studying brain activity in health and disease. However, as BoC is still in its infancy, the availability of combined BoC-electrophysiology platforms is still limited. Here, we summarize the available biological substrates for BoC, starting with a historical perspective. We then describe the available tools enabling BoC electrophysiology studies, detailing their fabrication process and technical features, along with their advantages and limitations. We discuss the current and future applications of BoC electrophysiology, also expanding to complementary approaches. We conclude with an evaluation of the potential translational applications and prospective technology developments.

Indexed as

3D neuronal culturesbiohybridbiomimetic tissuebrain-on-chipbrain organoidin vitro electrophysiologyMEMSmicrofluidicsneural spheroidtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID33498905
PMCPMC7912435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.