Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33498904›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Wearable Devices for Ergonomics: A Systematic Literature Review.

Elena Stefana, Filippo Marciano, Diana Rossi, Paola Cocca, Giuseppe Tomasoni

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
25.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena StefanaDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6679-0362
Filippo MarcianoDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3502-9092
Diana RossiDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4508-8811
Paola CoccaDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6351-6042
Giuseppe TomasoniDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2938-4864
University of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable devices are pervasive solutions for increasing work efficiency, improving workers' well-being, and creating interactions between users and the environment anytime and anywhere. Although several studies on their use in various fields have been performed, there are no systematic reviews on their utilisation in ergonomics. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to identify wearable devices proposed in the scientific literature for ergonomic purposes and analyse how they can support the improvement of ergonomic conditions. Twenty-eight papers were retrieved and analysed thanks to eleven comparison dimensions related to ergonomic factors, purposes, and criteria, populations, application and validation. The majority of the available devices are sensor systems composed of different types and numbers of sensors located in diverse body parts. These solutions also represent the technology most frequently employed for monitoring and reducing the risk of awkward postures. In addition, smartwatches, body-mounted smartphones, insole pressure systems, and vibrotactile feedback interfaces have been developed for evaluating and/or controlling physical loads or postures. The main results and the defined framework of analysis provide an overview of the state of the art of smart wearables in ergonomics, support the selection of the most suitable ones in industrial and non-industrial settings, and suggest future research directions.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsWearable Electronic DevicesHumansPostureSmartphoneTechnologybiomechanical riskhuman factorsIndustry 4.0real-time measurementrisk factorsensorwearable technologywork-related musculoskeletal disorder

Identifiers

PMID33498904
PMCPMC7865302
OpenAlexW3121322113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.