Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33498843›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Dairy Caretaker Perspectives on Performing Euthanasia as an Essential Component of Their Job.

Ivette Noami Román-Muñiz, Mary Caitlin Cramer, Lily N Edwards-Callaway, Lorann Stallones, Elizabeth Kim, Sofia Thompson, Hailey Simpson, Sage Mijares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. "If you have livestock…" Experiences in training farmers and farm workers to perform euthanasia.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ivette Noami Román-MuñizDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Mary Caitlin CramerDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6391-2387
Lily N Edwards-CallawayDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0737-9899
Lorann StallonesDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-582X
Elizabeth KimDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Sofia ThompsonDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Hailey SimpsonDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8462-2808
Sage MijaresCollege of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6114-3246

Funding

ACL HHS U54OH008085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to identify caretakers' perceptions and stressors related to performing on-farm euthanasia as well as potential ideas for intervention strategies to alleviate negative effects of performing euthanasia on caretaker well-being. Additionally, we aimed to determine how euthanasia methods, procedures, and training correlate with dairy caretakers' attitudes toward performing on-farm euthanasia and their job satisfaction and sense of well-being. Thirty-eight dairy caretakers (19 workers, 15 supervisors, 3 owners, 1 veterinarian) participated in focus groups or interviews conducted and recorded on five Northern Colorado dairies. Thematic analysis of focus group and interview transcripts revealed seven recurring themes. Variation in available training and euthanasia protocols among dairy farms was evident. There was a lack of awareness regarding available mental health resources and little communication between farm personnel about euthanasia-related stress. Training was correlated with caretaker knowledge about euthanasia procedures and the language used to refer to euthanasia. Human-animal bonds and empathy toward animals were evident in participants regardless of training, job position, or dairy experience. Interventions such as training programs, mental health resources, and other support systems should be tested for effectiveness in addressing euthanasia-related stressors, improving euthanasia decision-making and practice, and increasing animal wellbeing on dairy farms.

Indexed as

dairy animal wellbeingdairy caretaker perceptionsdairy worker wellbeingeuthanasia-related stresshuman–animal bondon-farm euthanasia

Identifiers

PMID33498843
PMCPMC7912631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.