Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33498549›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Comparative Investigation on Phenolic Composition, Characterization and Antioxidant Potentials of Five Different Australian Grown Pear Varieties.

Zening Wang, Colin J Barrow, Frank R Dunshea, Hafiz A R Suleria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phenolic Compounds fromAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of human gut lactic acid bacteria.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Valorization of a Local Italian Pear (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zening WangSchool of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Colin J BarrowCentre for Chemistry and Biotechnology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3217, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2153-7267
Frank R DunsheaSchool of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-1240
Hafiz A R SuleriaSchool of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2450-0830

Funding

Faculty Research Initiative Funds, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia UoM-19/20McKenzie Fellowship Scheme, The University of Melbourne, Australia Grant No. UoM-18/21Richard WS Nicholas Agricultural Science Scholarship, The University of Melbourne, Australia UoM-20/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pear (

Indexed as

antioxidant activityHPLC-PDALC-MS/MSpearphenolic compounds

Identifiers

PMID33498549
PMCPMC7909527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.