Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33498468›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Performance and Meat Quality of Intrauterine Growth Restricted Pigs.

Piotr Matyba, Tomasz Florowski, Krzysztof Dasiewicz, Karolina Ferenc, Jarosław Olszewski, Michał Trela, Gilbert Galemba, Mirosław Słowiński, Maria Sady, Dominika Domańska and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piotr MatybaDepartment of Large Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Veterinary Research Centre, Center for Biomedicine Research, Center for Regenerative Medicine, 02-797 Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz FlorowskiDepartment of Food Technology and Assessment, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1358-7395
Krzysztof DasiewiczDepartment of Food Technology and Assessment, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7437-4561
Karolina FerencDepartment of Large Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Veterinary Research Centre, Center for Biomedicine Research, Center for Regenerative Medicine, 02-797 Warsaw, Poland.
Jarosław OlszewskiDepartment of Large Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Veterinary Research Centre, Center for Biomedicine Research, Center for Regenerative Medicine, 02-797 Warsaw, Poland.
Michał TrelaDepartment of Large Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Veterinary Research Centre, Center for Biomedicine Research, Center for Regenerative Medicine, 02-797 Warsaw, Poland.
Gilbert GalembaPig Farm, 62-600 Kiełczew Smużny IV, Poland.
Mirosław SłowińskiDepartment of Food Technology and Assessment, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5924-1277
Maria SadyDepartment of Large Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Veterinary Research Centre, Center for Biomedicine Research, Center for Regenerative Medicine, 02-797 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9704-0372
Dominika DomańskaDepartment of Large Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Veterinary Research Centre, Center for Biomedicine Research, Center for Regenerative Medicine, 02-797 Warsaw, Poland.
Zdzisław GajewskiDepartment of Large Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Veterinary Research Centre, Center for Biomedicine Research, Center for Regenerative Medicine, 02-797 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8779-5050
Romuald ZabielskiDepartment of Large Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Veterinary Research Centre, Center for Biomedicine Research, Center for Regenerative Medicine, 02-797 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1725-9783
Warsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

EFRR RPO WM2007-2013 EFRR RPO WM2007-2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) pigs are characterized by high perinatal mortality and dysfunction of internal organs, adipose, and muscle tissues. However, little is known about the post-weaning performance and meat quality of the IUGR pigs. The aim of this study was to compare normal pigs and pigs with IUGR from birth until slaughter, also with respect to their meat quality. Pigs with the IUGR achieved lower slaughter weight but did not differ significantly from normal pigs in terms of their meat content. The IUGR did not negatively affect the culinary quality of the obtained meat, including its content of basic chemical components and energy value, as well as hardness, chewiness, cohesiveness, elasticity, and penetration force. The meat of the IUGR pigs, when compared to the meat of normal pigs, was characterized by higher pH, lower EC (Electrical Conductivity) and drip loss; it was also tenderer and obtained higher scores in sensory evaluation of taste, smell, and general desirability. Therefore, such raw material can be appreciated by the consumers and can be used for the production of culinary portions similarly to the raw material obtained from normal pigs.

Indexed as

growth performanceIUGRmeat qualitypigssensory evaluation

Identifiers

PMID33498468
PMCPMC7909567
OpenAlexW3121170802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.