Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33498224›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Facilitating Sustainable Disaster Risk Reduction in Indigenous Communities: Reviving Indigenous Worldviews, Knowledge, and Practices through Two-Way Partnering.

Tahir Ali, Petra Topaz Buergelt, Douglas Paton, James Arnold Smith, Elaine Lawurrpa Maypilama, Dorothy Yuŋgirrŋa, Stephen Dhamarrandji, Rosemary Gundjarranbuy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Practices Supporting Community Recovery and Healing from Climate-Related Disasters: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tahir AliCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin 0810, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1767-0345
Petra Topaz BuergeltFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5248-2644
Douglas PatonCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin 0810, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8673-2178
James Arnold SmithWellbeing and Preventable Chronic Conditions, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin 0810, Australia.
Elaine Lawurrpa MaypilamaCollege of Indigenous Futures, Arts & Society, Charles Darwin University, Darwin 0810, Australia.
Dorothy YuŋgirrŋaYalu Marŋgithinyaraw, Galiwin'ku, East Arnhem Land, The Northern Territory 0822, Australia.
Stephen DhamarrandjiYalu Marŋgithinyaraw, Galiwin'ku, East Arnhem Land, The Northern Territory 0822, Australia.
Rosemary GundjarranbuyYalu Marŋgithinyaraw, Galiwin'ku, East Arnhem Land, The Northern Territory 0822, Australia.
Charles Darwin University · AUUniversity of Canberra · AUMenzies School of Health Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sendai Framework of Action 2015-2030 calls for holistic Indigenous disaster risk reduction (DRR) research. Responding to this call, we synergized a holistic philosophical framework (comprising ecological systems theory, symbolic interactionism, and intersectionality) and social constructionist grounded theory and ethnography within a critical Indigenous research paradigm as a methodology for exploring how diverse individual and contextual factors influence DRR in a remote Indigenous community called Galiwinku, in the Northern Territory of Australia. Working together, Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers collected stories in local languages using conversations and yarning circles with 20 community members, as well as participant observations. The stories were interpreted and analysed using social constructivist grounded theory analysis techniques. The findings were dialogued with over 50 community members. The findings deeply resonated with the community members, validating the trustworthiness and relevance of the findings. The grounded theory that emerged identified two themes. First, local Indigenous knowledge and practices strengthen Indigenous people and reduce the risks posed by natural hazards. More specifically, deep reciprocal relationships with country and ecological knowledge, strong kinship relations, Elder's wisdom and authority, women and men sharing power, and faith in a supreme power/God and Indigenous-led community organizations enable DRR. Second, colonizing practices weaken Indigenous people and increase the risks from natural hazards. Therefore, colonization, the imposition of Western culture, the government application of top-down approaches, infiltration in Indigenous governance systems, the use of fly-in/fly-out workers, scarcity of employment, restrictions on technical and higher education opportunities, and overcrowded housing that is culturally and climatically unsuitable undermine the DRR capability. Based on the findings, we propose a Community-Based DRR theory which proposes that facilitating sustainable Indigenous DRR in Australian Indigenous communities requires Indigenous and non-Indigenous partners to genuinely work together in two-directional and complementary ways.

Indexed as

DisastersRisk Reduction BehaviorAgedAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleNorthern TerritoryPopulation Groupscritical Indigenous methodologydisaster risk reductionholistic Indigenous researchIndigenous developmentpartnership-based approachessustainable community development

Identifiers

PMID33498224
PMCPMC7908329
OpenAlexW3121558776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.