Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33498018›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021

New target volume delineation and PTV strategies to further personalise radiotherapy.

David Bernstein, Alexandra Taylor, Simeon Nill, Uwe Oelfke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Emerging technologies for cancer therapy using accelerated particles.Progress in particle and nuclear physics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David BernsteinJoint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7442-0698
Alexandra TaylorGynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom.
Simeon NillJoint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
Uwe OelfkeJoint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 28284Cancer Research UK C33589/A19727Department of Health HCS DRF-2014-05-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target volume delineation uncertainty (DU) is arguably one of the largest geometric uncertainties in radiotherapy that are accounted for using planning target volume (PTV) margins. Geometrical uncertainties are typically derived from a limited sample of patients. Consequently, the resultant margins are not tailored to individual patients. Furthermore, standard PTVs cannot account for arbitrary anisotropic extensions of the target volume originating from DU. We address these limitations by developing a method to measure DU for each patient by a single clinician. This information is then used to produce PTVs that account for each patient's unique DU, including any required anisotropic component. We do so using a two-step uncertainty evaluation strategy that does not rely on multiple samples of data to capture the DU of a patient's gross tumour volume (GTV) or clinical target volume. For simplicity, we will just refer to the GTV in the following. First, the clinician delineates two contour sets; one which bounds all voxels believed to have a probability of belonging to the GTV of 1, while the second includes all voxels with a probability greater than 0. Next, one specifies a probability density function for the true GTV boundary position within the boundaries of the two contours. Finally, a patient-specific PTV, designed to account for all systematic errors, is created using this information along with measurements of the other systematic errors. Clinical examples indicate that our margin strategy can produce significantly smaller PTVs than the van Herk margin recipe. Our new radiotherapy target delineation concept allows DUs to be quantified by the clinician for each patient, leading to PTV margins that are tailored to each unique patient, thus paving the way to a greater personalisation of radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineHumansNeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTumor BurdenUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID33498018
PMCPMC8208617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.