Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33497438›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Comparison of methods for estimating genetic correlation between complex traits using GWAS summary statistics.

Yiliang Zhang, Youshu Cheng, Wei Jiang, Yixuan Ye, Qiongshi Lu, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Genetic Correlation and Causal Inference Between Female Fat Distribution and Preeclampsia: An Integrative Genomic Study.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Use of AI for Phenotype-Genotype Mapping.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yiliang ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9851-7870
Youshu ChengDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Wei JiangDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6120-5278
Yixuan YeProgram of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Qiongshi LuDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4514-0969
Hongyu ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NIH HHS 3P30AG021342-16S2Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic correlation is the correlation of phenotypic effects by genetic variants across the genome on two phenotypes. It is an informative metric to quantify the overall genetic similarity between complex traits, which provides insights into their polygenic genetic architecture. Several methods have been proposed to estimate genetic correlation based on data collected from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Due to the easy access of GWAS summary statistics and computational efficiency, methods only requiring GWAS summary statistics as input have become more popular than methods utilizing individual-level genotype data. Here, we present a benchmark study for different summary-statistics-based genetic correlation estimation methods through simulation and real data applications. We focus on two major technical challenges in estimating genetic correlation: marker dependency caused by linkage disequilibrium (LD) and sample overlap between different studies. To assess the performance of different methods in the presence of these two challenges, we first conducted comprehensive simulations with diverse LD patterns and sample overlaps. Then we applied these methods to real GWAS summary statistics for a wide spectrum of complex traits. Based on these experiments, we conclude that methods relying on accurate LD estimation are less robust in real data applications due to the imprecision of LD obtained from reference panels. Our findings offer guidance on how to choose appropriate methods for genetic correlation estimation in post-GWAS analysis.

Indexed as

Linkage DisequilibriumMultifactorial InheritancePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideBenchmarkingCohort StudiesComputer SimulationData AccuracyGene FrequencyGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansbenchmarkingcomplex traitsgenetic correlationGWAS summary statistics

Identifiers

PMID33497438
PMCPMC8425307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.