Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33497420›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

Temporal development and neutralising potential of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: An observational cohort study.

Isa Murrell, Donall Forde, Wioleta Zelek, Linda Tyson, Lisa Chichester, Nicki Palmer, Rachel Jones, B Paul Morgan, Catherine Moore

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isa MurrellWales Specialist Virology Centre, Public Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5601-766X
Donall FordeWales Specialist Virology Centre, Public Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
Wioleta ZelekSystems Immunity Research Institute, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
Linda TysonWales Specialist Virology Centre, Public Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
Lisa ChichesterWales Specialist Virology Centre, Public Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
Nicki PalmerWales Specialist Virology Centre, Public Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
Rachel JonesWales Specialist Virology Centre, Public Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
B Paul MorganSystems Immunity Research Institute, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
Catherine MooreWales Specialist Virology Centre, Public Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
University Hospital of Wales · GBCardiff University · GB

Funding

HCRW_ HF-19-1595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody responses are important in the control of viral respiratory infection in the human host. What is not clear for SARS-CoV-2 is how rapidly this response occurs, or when antibodies with protective capability evolve. Hence, defining the events of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion and the time frame for the development of antibodies with protective potential may help to explain the different clinical presentations of COVID-19. Furthermore, accurate descriptions of seroconversion are needed to inform the best use of serological assays for diagnostic testing and serosurveillance studies. Here, we describe the humoral responses in a cohort of hospitalised COVID-19 patients (n = 19) shortly following the onset of symptoms. Commercial and 'in-house' serological assays were used to measure IgG antibodies against different SARS-CoV-2 structural antigens-Spike (S) S1 sub-unit and Nucleocapsid protein (NP)-and to assess the potential for virus neutralisation mediated specifically by inhibition of binding between the viral attachment protein (S protein) and cognate receptor (ACE-2). Antibody response kinetics varied amongst the cohort, with patients seroconverting within 1 week, between 1-2 weeks, or after 2 weeks, following symptom onset. Anti-NP IgG responses were generally detected earlier, but reached maximum levels slower, than anti-S1 IgG responses. The earliest IgG antibodies produced by all patients included those that recognised the S protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) and were capable of inhibiting binding to ACE-2. These data revealed events and patterns of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion that may be important predictors of the outcome of infection and guide the delivery of clinical services in the COVID-19 response.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCohort StudiesCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedPhosphoproteinsSARS-CoV-2SeroconversionAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsImmunoglobulin Gnucleocapsid phosphoprotein, SARS-CoV-2PhosphoproteinsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33497420
PMCPMC7837461
OpenAlexW3126138080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.