Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33496939›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2022

Eosinophils in the Field of Nasal Polyposis: Towards a Better Understanding of Biologic Therapies.

Thibault Vanderhaegen, Isabelle Gengler, Arnaud Dendooven, Cecile Chenivesse, Guillaume Lefèvre, Geoffrey Mortuaire

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Effects of Mepolizumab in the treatment of type 2 CRSwNP: a real-life clinical study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Determinants of Eosinophilia in Patients With Severe Asthma.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thibault VanderhaegenOtorhinolaryngology - Head and neck Department, Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Isabelle GenglerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, OH, Cincinnati, USA.
Arnaud DendoovenUniv. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1286 - INFINITE - Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, 59000, Lille, France.
Cecile ChenivessePneumology and Allergology Department, Calmette Hospital, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Guillaume LefèvreUniv. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1286 - INFINITE - Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, 59000, Lille, France.
Geoffrey MortuaireOtorhinolaryngology - Head and neck Department, Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France. geoffrey.mortuaire@chru-lille.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1592-1625
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophils are often considered as the pathologic landmark of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Many studies emphasize their pivotal role in mucosal remodeling by their innate action via cytotoxic proteins degranulation. Eosinophil nasal recruitment from the bloodstream through endothelium diapedeses requires the intricate action between the nasal epithelium, epithelial cell-activated type 2 innate lymphoid cells, and adaptive immune cells secreting alarmins, cytokines, and specific chemokines. This immune pathway refers to a T-helper 2 (T2)-driven lymphocyte response, often considered as the main inflammatory process in CRSwNP in western countries. The release of T2 cytokines, among which interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13, fundamentally contributes to this immune response. New biologic agents capable of blocking T2 cytokines have been developed in the field of eosinophil-associated diseases, shifting the paradigm of treatment for patients with CRSwNP. The first part of this review describes each step of the eosinophil journey from hematopoietic stem cell maturation to nasal mucosa homing. The different eosinophil activation processes and their inflammatory functions are also described. This is followed by a discussion on currently available biologic therapies in CRSwNP with a specific focus on eosinophilic response. Beyond an eosinophil-blocking strategy, a cluster analysis of specific T2 biomarkers could be required to best predict the response to such biologic therapies in the future.

Indexed as

Nasal PolypsRhinitisBiological TherapyChronic DiseaseEosinophilsHumansImmunity, InnateLymphocytesNasal MucosaBiologic therapyChronic rhinosinusitisEosinophilInterleukinNasal polyp

Identifiers

PMID33496939
OpenAlexW3125310553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.