Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33496934›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

Analysis of Internet-Based Search Patterns Utilized by Glioma Patients as Information Source.

Chloe Ah-Ryung Lim, Paris-Ann Ingledew, Fan Yang, Brian Thiessen, Rosemary Cashman, Nafisha Lalani, Sharon Kipfer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating How Patients with Thyroid Cancer Use Online Resources and Social Media to Access Health Information.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chloe Ah-Ryung LimMD Undergraduate Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. chloe.ah.lim@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6506-1742
Paris-Ann IngledewRadiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1912-3276
Fan YangRadiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Brian ThiessenMedical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0752-6673
Rosemary CashmanMedical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nafisha LalaniRadiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2158-0174
Sharon KipferMD Undergraduate Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the Internet usage pattern amongst glioma patients and to characterize its impact in their decision-making and clinical interactions. Glioma patients attending a tertiary cancer center between June and December 2019 were invited to participate in this study. A 26-item survey consisting of closed and open-ended questions was distributed with a unique identifier. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics using SPSS Statistical package, and qualitative data with grounded theory approach. Thirty-two patients completed the survey. Demographics varied in age, time since diagnosis, glioma type, and level of education. Eighty-one percent were identified as "Internet users" who sought online glioma information. Google was the most popular search engine (96%), with "glioma" being the most frequent search term. The selection of websites often relied on perceived credibility and top search hits. The most searched topic was prognosis (73%). The majority of patients found that online information was easy to understand, and this did not vary significantly amongst age groups. Website quality was always assessed by 60% of patients. Only 62% patients found the Internet a useful resource, and 70% patients found it facilitated their understanding. Most patients discussed their Internet findings with a physician, largely regarding concerns about reliability. There is variable glioma information available online. Patients with glioma use the Internet as a resource, with variable impact on their interactions and decision-making. This information can be used by physicians, educators, and website developers to support glioma patients' needs.

Indexed as

PhysiciansSearch EngineHumansInternetReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesGliomaInternet informationOnline resourcesPatient educationWeb resources

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.