Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33496931›Full record

Observational studyObesity surgery2021

Applying an Anti-reflux Suture in the One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Prevent Biliary Reflux: a Long-Term Observational Study.

Nienke Slagter, Jonne Hopman, Anna G Altenburg, Loek J M de Heide, Ewoud H Jutte, Mirjam A Kaijser, Stefan L Damen, André P van Beek, Marloes Emous

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Comparison of the Long-term Outcomes of RYGB and OAGB as Conversion Procedures After Failed LSG - a Case-Control Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nienke SlagterCenter for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands. Nienke.Slagter@mcl.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6729-7791
Jonne HopmanCenter for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Anna G AltenburgCenter for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Loek J M de HeideCenter for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Ewoud H JutteCenter for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Mirjam A KaijserCenter for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Stefan L DamenCenter for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
André P van BeekDepartment of Endocrinology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Marloes EmousCenter for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is an effective treatment to induce sustained weight loss in morbidly obese patients. Concerns remain regarding the development of reflux. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of an "anti-reflux suture" as anti-reflux modification to prevent reflux.

methodThis is a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent a primary OAGB at the Center Obesity North-Netherlands (CON) between January 2015 and December 2016. Reflux was defined as symptoms of acid/bilious regurgitation or pyrosis. This was consequently asked and reported at each follow-up visit. Outcomes of patients with an anti-reflux suture were compared to those without.

resultsIn 414 (59%) of the 703 included patients, an anti-reflux suture was applied. Follow-up at 3 years was 74%. The incidence of reflux did not differ between patients with or without an anti-reflux suture (57 versus 56%, respectively; P = 0.9). The presence of an anti-reflux suture was significantly associated with a lower incidence of conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for reflux (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.34-0.91). Patients preoperatively diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were 5.2 times more likely to need a conversion to RYGB for reflux (95%CI 2.7-10.1).

conclusionThe presence of preoperative GERD should be weighted heavily in the decision to perform an OAGB as this is a major risk factor for conversion surgery due to reflux. The anti-reflux suture might be a valuable addition to the procedure of the OAGB because it results in fewer conversion surgeries for reflux.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassGastroesophageal RefluxObesity, MorbidHumansNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesSuturesBariatric surgeryBiliary refluxGastroesophageal reflux diseaseMini gastric bypassOne anastomosis gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID33496931
OpenAlexW3123484172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.