Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33496891›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021

Radiologically isolated syndrome: from biological bases to practical management.

Andres G Barboza, Edgar Carnero Contentti, Maria Celeste Curbelo, Mario Javier Halfon, Juan Ignacio Rojas, Berenice A Silva, Vladimiro Sinay, Santiago Tizio, Maria Celica Ysrraelit, Ricardo Alonso

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Andres G BarbozaServicio de Neurologia, Hospital Central de Mendoza, España 120, 5500, Mendoza, Argentina. agbarboza@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5487-6241
Edgar Carnero ContenttiNeuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Maria Celeste CurbeloMS Section Hospital Britanico Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mario Javier HalfonMS Section Hospital Britanico Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan Ignacio RojasCentro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Berenice A SilvaClínica de Esclerosis Múltiple, Hospital Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Vladimiro SinayFundación Favaloro/INECO, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Santiago TizioHospital Español de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Maria Celica YsrraelitDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Neurological Research Dr. Raul Carrea, FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ricardo AlonsoClínica de Esclerosis Múltiple, Hospital Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires · ARHospital Ramos Mejía · ARFavaloro University · ARFundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia · ARHospital Alemán · ARHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires · ARHospital Italiano La Plata · ARUniversity of Mendoza · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnological advances and greater availability of magnetic resonance imaging have prompted an increment on incidental and unexpected findings within the central nervous system. The concept of radiologically isolated syndrome characterizes a group of subjects with images suggestive of demyelinating disease in the absence of a clinical episode compatible with multiple sclerosis. Since the description of this entity, many questions have arisen; some have received responses but others remain unanswered. A panel of experts met with the objective of performing a critical review of the currently available evidence. Definition, prevalence, biological bases, published evidence, and implications on patient management were reviewed. Thirty to 50% of subjects with radiologically isolated syndrome will progress to multiple sclerosis in 5 years. Male sex, age < 37 years old, and spinal lesions increase the risk. These subjects should be evaluated by a multiple sclerosis specialist, carefully excluding alternative diagnosis. An initial evaluation should include a brain and complete spine magnetic resonance, visual evoked potentials, and identification of oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid. Disease-modifying therapies could be considered when oligoclonal bands or radiological progression is present.

conclusionAt present time, radiologically isolated syndrome cannot be considered a part of the multiple sclerosis spectrum. However, a proportion of patients may evolve to multiple sclerosis, meaning it represents much more than just a radiological finding.

Indexed as

Demyelinating DiseasesMultiple SclerosisAdultEvoked Potentials, VisualHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOligoclonal BandsOligoclonal BandsBiomarkersMagnetic resonance imagingMultiple sclerosisOligoclonal bandsRadiologically isolated syndrome

Identifiers

PMID33496891
OpenAlexW3125414563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.