ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2021
[Clinical implications of the estimated glomerular filtration rate].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Pharmacological treatment of cardiovascular diseases in old age : Geriatic perspective].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A correct determination of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is necessary and at the same time difficult. Using gold standard methods, such as measurement of inulin clearance, are not feasible in clinical practice raising the need for methods to estimate GFR using easy to measure endogenous biomarkers. Plasma concentrations of the filtration markers creatinine and cystatin C alone are not adequate to easily calculate kidney function. This is mainly due to a non-linear relationship between plasma concentrations and GFR and GFR-independent factors influencing the plasma concentrations. Therefore, formulae have been developed to estimate GFR using easily available variables. Currently, the most useful formulae are those developed by the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) study and more recently by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology (CKD-EPI) collaboration. For older individuals some specifically validated formulae were developed some years ago, among them the Berlin initiative study 1 (BIS-1) and BIS‑2 formulae. The accuracy of the estimated filtration rate (eGFR) with respect to the true GFR depends on various factors. The accuracy of the formula is especially low in the GFR range above 60 ml/min · 1.73 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
33496834What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.