Trial reportEuropean radiology2021
A deep learning model integrating mammography and clinical factors facilitates the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in breast cancer screening.
Trial report in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic literature review on mammography: deep learning techniques for breast cancer detection with global and Asian perspectives.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in mammography: a systematic review of the external validation.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024Pooled it
- Combined diagnosis of multiparametric MRI-based deep learning models facilitates differentiating triple-negative breast cancer from fibroadenoma magnetic resonance BI-RADS 4 lesions.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Trial
- Radiomics-based differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses on contrast-enhanced mammography: a reproducible workflow using open-source tools.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- ABUS-ResMask-Net: ABUS Lesion Classification Network Design with ResMask Module and BI-RADS Content-Awareness Auxiliary Tasks.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Based Classification of BI-RADS 4 and BI-RADS 5 Microcalcifications in Mammography Combined with DCE-MRI for Malignant-Benign Discrimination.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Early Breast Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review of Innovations in Preventive Women's Healthcare.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A deep learning system for non-invasive breast cancer diagnosis with multimodal data.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- What the AI era doctor should know: a scoping review of proposed artificial intelligence competencies for medical education.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating Ultrasound and DCE-MRI Improves Accuracy in Differentiating Breast Adenosis from Carcinoma.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Article
- Transforming Breast Imaging: A Narrative Review of Systematic Evidence on Artificial Intelligence in Mammographic Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diagnostic performance of ultrasound S-Detect technology in evaluating BI-RADS-4 breast nodules ≤ 20 mm and > 20 mm.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Based on Digital Mammography to Reduce the Need for Invasive Biopsies of Benign Calcifications Classified in BI-RADS Category 4.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting Very Early-Stage Breast Cancer in BI-RADS 3 Lesions of Large Population with Deep Learning.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Transparency and Representation in Clinical Research Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Scoping Review.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Deep-learning based electromagnetic navigation system for transthoracic percutaneous puncture of small pulmonary nodules.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An improved random forest algorithm for tracing the origin of metastatic renal cancer tissues.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Prediction of metastatic risk of renal clear cell carcinoma based on CT radiomics analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Identifying clinically relevant findings in breast cancer using deep learning and feature attribution on local views from high-resolution mammography.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the value of full-field digital mammography-based deep learning (DL) in predicting malignancy of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 microcalcifications.
methodsA total of 384 patients with 414 pathologically confirmed microcalcifications (221 malignant and 193 benign) were randomly allocated into the training, validation, and testing datasets (272/71/71 lesions) in this retrospective study. A combined DL model was developed incorporating mammography and clinical variables. Model performance was evaluated by using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared with the clinical model, stand-alone DL image model, and BI-RADS approach. The predictive performance for malignancy was also compared between the combined model and human readers (2 juniors and 2 seniors).
resultsThe combined DL model demonstrated favorable AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.910, 85.3%, and 91.9% in predicting BI-RADS 4 malignant microcalcifications in the testing dataset, which outperformed the clinical model, DL image model, and BI-RADS with AUCs of 0.799, 0.841, and 0.804, respectively. The combined model achieved non-inferior performance as senior radiologists (p = 0.860, p = 0.800) and outperformed junior radiologists (p = 0.155, p = 0.029). The diagnostic performance of two junior radiologists was improved after artificial intelligence assistance with AUCs increased to 0.854 and 0.901 from 0.816 (p = 0.556) and 0.773 (p = 0.046), while the interobserver agreement was improved with a kappa value increased to 0.843 from 0.331.
conclusionsThe combined deep learning model can improve the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in screening mammography and assist junior radiologists to achieve better performance, which can facilitate clinical decision-making. KEY POINTS: • The combined deep learning model demonstrated high diagnostic power, sensitivity, and specificity for predicting malignant BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications. • The combined model achieved similar performance with senior breast radiologists, while it outperformed junior breast radiologists. • Deep learning could improve the diagnostic performance of junior radiologists and facilitate clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.