ReviewDer Pathologe2021
[Radiological features of interstitial lung diseases].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative comparative analysis of different CT modalities in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: correlations with lung function, serological biomarkers, and disease stratification.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Fibrosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In addition to pneumology and pathology, radiology is an essential discipline in the interdisciplinary diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). The gold standard for diagnosis of ILD is computed tomography. Diagnostic findings are based on specific radiological signs such as interlobular septal thickening and nodular changes. From these signs and their distribution within the lung, radiological patterns can be derived, e.g., usual interstitial pneumonia, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, or organizing pneumonia. Various differential diagnoses result from the radiological pattern, which can then be further limited in an interdisciplinary manner with the clinic and pathology and, if necessary, trigger further diagnostics.The visual assessment of interstitial lung changes requires experience and training and is nevertheless error-prone with high inter- and intraobserver variabilities. Recently, therefore, computer-aided analysis of ILDs has been increasingly promoted. These computer programs analyze the density distribution of the lung parenchyma using parameters such as mean lung density, skewness, and kurtosis thus enabling the quantification and assessment of the course of disease. Furthermore, texture analysis and artificial intelligence are used to characterize parenchymal changes and differentiate between regions of ground glass, reticulation, and honeycombing. Modern dual-energy CT methods allow a combined, regional recording of both the morphology and the function and provide information about regional ventilation and perfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.