Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33496775›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2021

Effect of Behavioral Therapy With In-Clinic or Telephone Group Visits vs In-Clinic Individual Visits on Weight Loss Among Patients With Obesity in Rural Clinical Practice: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Christie A Befort, Jeffrey J VanWormer, Cyrus Desouza, Edward F Ellerbeck, Byron Gajewski, Kim S Kimminau, K Allen Greiner, Michael G Perri, Alexandra R Brown, Ram D Pathak and 3 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
23.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02456636 nacompletednot on this map

Rural Engagement in Primary Care for Optimizing Weight Reduction (RE-POWER)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2016 to 2019Enrolled1,432ConditionsObesityArmsFee-for-Service Model (FFS, In clinic individual visits), Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH, In clinic group visits), Disease Management (DM, Phone group visits)
NCT05425797 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Building on Existing Tools To Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care Virtually: the Virtual BETTER Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMemorial University of NewfoundlandRan2023 to 2024Enrolled92ConditionsDelivery Modality of BETTER InterventionArmsIn-Person Prevention Practitioner Visit, Video-Call Prevention Practitioner Visit, Phone Prevention Practitioner Visit
NCT07268417 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Group Medical Appointments for Intensive Lifestyle Treatment for Obesity in Cleveland Clinic Primary Care Practices

TypeobservationalSponsorAnita Misra-HebertRan2024 to 2028Enrolled3,600ConditionsObesity & OverweightArmsACTIVATE OC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Christie A BefortDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
Jeffrey J VanWormerCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin.
Cyrus DesouzaDivision of Endocrinology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Edward F EllerbeckDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
Byron GajewskiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
Kim S KimminauDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
K Allen GreinerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
Michael G PerriCollege of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Alexandra R BrownDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
Ram D PathakDepartment of Endocrinology, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin.
Terry T-K HuangSchool of Public Health and Health Policy, Center for Systems and Community Design, City University of New York, New York, New York.
Leslie EilandDivision of Endocrinology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Andjela DrincicDivision of Endocrinology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USCity University of New York · USMarshfield Clinic · USMarshfield Clinic · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Rural populations have a higher prevalence of obesity and poor access to weight loss programs. Effective models for treating obesity in rural clinical practice are needed. Objective: To compare the Medicare Intensive Behavioral Therapy for Obesity fee-for-service model with 2 alternatives: in-clinic group visits based on a patient-centered medical home model and telephone-based group visits based on a disease management model. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster randomized trial conducted in 36 primary care practices in the rural Midwestern US. Inclusion criteria included age 20 to 75 years and body mass index of 30 to 45. Participants were enrolled from February 2016 to October 2017. Final follow-up occurred in December 2019. Interventions: All participants received a lifestyle intervention focused on diet, physical activity, and behavior change strategies. In the fee-for-service intervention (n = 473), practice-employed clinicians provided 15-minute in-clinic individual visits at a frequency similar to that reimbursed by Medicare (weekly for 1 month, biweekly for 5 months, and monthly thereafter). In the in-clinic group intervention (n = 468), practice-employed clinicians delivered group visits that were weekly for 3 months, biweekly for 3 months, and monthly thereafter. In the telephone group intervention (n = 466), patients received the same intervention as the in-clinic group intervention, but sessions were delivered remotely via conference calls by centralized staff. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was weight change at 24 months. A minimum clinically important difference was defined as 2.75 kg. Results: Among 1407 participants (mean age, 54.7 [SD, 11.8] years; baseline body mass index, 36.7 [SD, 4.0]; 1081 [77%] women), 1220 (87%) completed the trial. Mean weight loss at 24 months was -4.4 kg (95% CI, -5.5 to -3.4 kg) in the in-clinic group intervention, -3.9 kg (95% CI, -5.0 to -2.9 kg) in the telephone group intervention, and -2.6 kg (95% CI, -3.6 to -1.5 kg) in the in-clinic individual intervention. Compared with the in-clinic individual intervention, the mean difference in weight change was -1.9 kg (97.5% CI, -3.5 to -0.2 kg; P = .01) for the in-clinic group intervention and -1.4 kg (97.5% CI, -3.0 to 0.3 kg; P = .06) for the telephone group intervention. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with obesity in rural primary care clinics, in-clinic group visits but not telephone-based group visits, compared with in-clinic individual visits, resulted in statistically significantly greater weight loss at 24 months. However, the differences were small in magnitude and of uncertain clinical importance. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02456636.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyPsychotherapy, GroupTelephoneAdultAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedObesityRural PopulationWeight Reduction Programs

Identifiers

PMID33496775
PMCPMC7838934
OpenAlexW3124199910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.