Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33496679›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Association Between Care Utilization and Anxiety Outcomes in an On-Demand Mental Health System: Retrospective Observational Study.

Sarah Kunkle, Manny Yip, Justin Hunt, Watson Ξ, Dana Udall, Patricia Arean, Andrew Nierenberg, John A Naslund

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah KunkleGinger, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6368-0205
Manny YipGinger, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7580-8798
Justin HuntGinger, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-1048
Watson ΞGinger, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8354-5708
Dana UdallGinger, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1730-4460
Patricia AreanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-6319
Andrew NierenbergMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2897-0458
John A NaslundDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6777-0104
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety is an extremely prevalent condition, and yet, it has received notably less attention than depression and other mental health conditions from a research, clinical, and public health perspective. The COVID-19 pandemic has only exacerbated growing concerns about the burden of anxiety due to the confluence of physical health risks, economic stressors, social isolation, and general disruption of daily activities.

objectiveThis study examines differences in anxiety outcomes by care modality (coaching, teletherapy and telepsychiatry, and combined care) within an on-demand mental health system. We also explore the association between levels of engagement within each care modality and odds of improvement in symptoms of anxiety.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of individuals who accessed Ginger, an on-demand mental health system. Data were collected from 1611 Ginger members between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. We used logistic regression to assess the association between care modality and improvement in anxiety symptoms. Within each modality, we assessed the association between level of engagement and improvement.

resultsOf 1611 Ginger members, 761 (47.0%) experienced a decrease in anxiety symptoms, as measured by a change from a positive to a negative 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) screen. Among members who still screened positive at follow-up (865/1611, 53%), a total of 192 members (11.9%) experienced a clinically significant score reduction in the full GAD-7 (ie, a score reduction of >5 points), even though their GAD-2 scores were still positive. All modalities showed increased odds of improvement compared to those who were not engaged with coaching or clinical services ("app-only"). Higher GAD-7 intake scores were also associated with decreased odds of improvement.

conclusionsThis study found increased odds of anxiety improvement for all care modalities compared to those who did not engage in care, with larger effect sizes for higher utilization within all care modalities. Additionally, there is a promising observation that those engaged in combined care (teletherapy and text-based coaching) had the greatest odds of anxiety improvement. Future directions include more detailed classifications of utilization patterns and an exploration of explanations and solutions for lower-utilization members.

Indexed as

anxietydigital healthmental healthobservationaloutcomeretrospectivetelehealthutilizationvirtual care

Identifiers

PMID33496679
PMCPMC7872836
OpenAlexW3115766721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.