Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33496655›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of urology2021

Magnetic resonance imaging procedure for pelvic fracture urethral injuries and recto urethral fistulas: A simplified protocol.

Pankaj M Joshi, Devang J Desai, Darshan Shah, Devashree P Joshi, Sanjay B Kulkarni

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Management of pelvic fracture urethral injury.Translational andrology and urology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Outcomes of partial pubectomy assisted anastomotic urethroplasty for male patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pankaj M JoshiKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2233-7785
Devang J DesaiKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1937-936X
Darshan ShahKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3704-0826
Devashree P JoshiKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6408-4504
Sanjay B KulkarniKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-4579
Kulkarni reconstructive Urology Center · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe urethral gap in pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) is traditionally assessed using voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) and retrograde urethrogram (RGU). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is performed in complex cases. We assessed the refined "Joshi" MRI protocol to evaluate complex urethral defects after PFUI. MATERIAL AND

methodsA prospective study was conducted at our center from January 2018 to January 2020, involving patients aged >18 years with PFUI, suitable for MRI, and those who gave consent to perform standard RGU, VCUG, and MRI using standard and "Joshi" protocol. Forty men were included in the study. Distance between urethral/prostatic stumps was measured. Image quality was scored by four radiologists and four urologists. The surgical approach and type of PFUI repair were noted. We also established the need for inferior pubectomy by assessing the position of the posterior urethra (membranous) in relation to a horizontal line drawn from the lower edge of the pubic bone anteriorly to the rectum posteriorly in a sagittal image.

resultsThe mean age was 30 years (SD, 5.25; range, 21-43), and the time from injury to imaging was 4 months (3-10 months); 40% of the men underwent crural separation, 57.5%, inferior pubectomy, and 2.5%, crural rerouting. There was a difference of 0.3 to 1.1 cm in the urethral gap measurements between MR images using the standard versus "Joshi" technique. MRI identified complex injuries such as rectourethral fistula, the need for inferior pubectomy, and the orientation of the posterior urethra. Urologists' and radiologists' satisfaction scores for the MR images were satisfactory to excellent. If the posterior urethra was over the defined mark, there was a 100% likelihood of inferior pubectomy (23/40 patients).

conclusionMR image acquisition using the "Joshi" protocol provided high-quality anatomical information in PFUI cases to assist with surgical planning.

Identifiers

PMID33496655
PMCPMC7815245
OpenAlexW3120151547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.