Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33496342›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2021

The impact of multifactorial stress combination on plant growth and survival.

Sara I Zandalinas, Soham Sengupta, Felix B Fritschi, Rajeev K Azad, Rachel Nechushtai, Ron Mittler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
47.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 323 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Identification of Key Differentially Expressed Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. When drought helps herbivores before it harms them.Journal of experimental botany · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Adaptive Responses of Tropical Crops: A Multi-Scale Omics Integrated Perspective.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara I ZandalinasDivision of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources and Interdisciplinary Plant Group, Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, 1201 Rollins St, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1256-9371
Soham SenguptaDepartment of Biological Sciences and BioDiscovery Institute, College of Science, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #305220, Denton, TX, 76203-5017, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5013-1506
Felix B FritschiDivision of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources and Interdisciplinary Plant Group, Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, 1201 Rollins St, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0825-6855
Rajeev K AzadDepartment of Biological Sciences and BioDiscovery Institute, College of Science, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #305220, Denton, TX, 76203-5017, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6874-6146
Rachel NechushtaiThe Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond J. Safra Campus at Givat Ram, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3219-954X
Ron MittlerDivision of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources and Interdisciplinary Plant Group, Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, 1201 Rollins St, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3192-7450
University of Missouri · USUniversity of North Texas · USHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change-driven extreme weather events, combined with increasing temperatures, harsh soil conditions, low water availability and quality, and the introduction of many man-made pollutants, pose a unique challenge to plants. Although our knowledge of the response of plants to each of these individual conditions is vast, we know very little about how a combination of many of these factors, occurring simultaneously, that is multifactorial stress combination, impacts plants. Seedlings of wild-type and different mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana plants were subjected to a multifactorial stress combination of six different stresses, each applied at a low level, and their survival, physiological and molecular responses determined. Our findings reveal that, while each of the different stresses, applied individually, had a negligible effect on plant growth and survival, the accumulated impact of multifactorial stress combination on plants was detrimental. We further show that the response of plants to multifactorial stress combination is unique and that specific pathways and processes play a critical role in the acclimation of plants to multifactorial stress combination. Taken together our findings reveal that further polluting our environment could result in higher complexities of multifactorial stress combinations that in turn could drive a critical decline in plant growth and survival.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant DevelopmentStress, PhysiologicalArabidopsis Proteinsabiotic stressArabidopsis thalianaclimate changeglobal warmingmultifactorial stress combinationreactive oxygen species (ROS)stress combinationtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID33496342
PMCPMC8048544
OpenAlexW3122836587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.