Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33496088›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2021

Social Media for Scholarly Communication in Central Asia and Its Neighbouring Countries.

Prithvi Sanjeevkumar Gaur, Latika Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. YouTube as a Source of Information on Public Health Ethics.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. How Twitter use in Rheumatology has Evolved.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2022
    Article
  11. Sustainable Development Goals in the Time of Crisis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Prithvi Sanjeevkumar GaurSmt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2341-1932
Latika GuptaDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. drlatikagupta@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2753-2990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current digital era has led to a surge in the use of Social Media in academia. Worldwide connectivity has brought to the fore a scarce participation of Central Asia and adjoining regions in scientific discussions. Global perspectives in science may not be recorded due to such communication disparities. An equal representation of all ethnic groups is essential to have a rounded picture of the topic at hand. The extent of use of social media platforms in various regions is determined by social, economic, religious, political, cultural and ethnic factors, which may limit participation. The paper aims to examine the use of social media by academicians in the Central Asian countries, China and Mongolia. It also focusses on the linguistic skills of the Central Asian, Chinese and Mongolian population and their eagerness to be involved in global discussions. Understanding the factors limiting participation from specific regions is the first step in this direction.

Indexed as

Scholarly CommunicationSocial MediaAsiaDeveloping CountriesHumansInternet AccessAccess to InformationCentral AsiaInternet AccessLanguageSocial Media

Identifiers

PMID33496088
PMCPMC7834904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.