Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33495927›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

Deep learning-assisted ultra-fast/low-dose whole-body PET/CT imaging.

Amirhossein Sanaat, Isaac Shiri, Hossein Arabi, Ismini Mainta, René Nkoulou, Habib Zaidi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Optimizing acquisition time and injected dose inBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical validation of a deep learning model for low-count PET image enhancement.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Data-efficient generalization of AI transformers for noise reduction in ultra-fast lung PET scans.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. EnhancingCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Amirhossein SanaatDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Isaac ShiriDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hossein ArabiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ismini MaintaDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
René NkoulouDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Habib ZaidiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland. habib.zaidi@hcuge.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7559-5297
University Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (CH) SNRF 320030_176052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTendency is to moderate the injected activity and/or reduce acquisition time in PET examinations to minimize potential radiation hazards and increase patient comfort. This work aims to assess the performance of regular full-dose (FD) synthesis from fast/low-dose (LD) whole-body (WB) PET images using deep learning techniques.

methodsInstead of using synthetic LD scans, two separate clinical WB

resultsCGAN scored 4.92 and 3.88 (out of 5) (adequate to good) for brain and neck + trunk, respectively. The average SUV bias calculated over normal tissues was 3.39 ± 0.71% and - 3.83 ± 1.25% for CGAN and RNET, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis reported the lowest SUV bias (0.01%) and 95% confidence interval of - 0.36, + 0.47 for CGAN compared with the reference FD images for malignant lesions.

conclusionCycleGAN is able to synthesize clinical FD WB PET images from LD images with 1/8th of standard injected activity or acquisition time. The predicted FD images present almost similar performance in terms of lesion detectability, qualitative scores, and quantification bias and variance.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18Deep learningLesion detectabilityLow-dose imagingPET/CTWhole-body imaging

Identifiers

PMID33495927
PMCPMC8241799
OpenAlexW3122629112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.