Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33495916›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2021

Joint position statement on management of patient with osteoporosis during COVID-19 contingency from the AMMOM, CONAMEGER, FELAEN, FEMECOG, FEMECOT, and ICAAFYD.

Francisco Torres-Naranjo, Pilar De la Peña-Rodríguez, Roberto Enrique López-Cervantes, Jorge Morales-Torres, Jorge Morales-Vargas, Hugo Gutiérrez-Hermosillo, Alan Christopher Guzmán-Rico, Roberto Gabriel González-Mendoza, Pedro Nel Rueda Plata, Miguel Flores Castro and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Fragility fracture systems, Latin America perspective.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Francisco Torres-NaranjoCentro de Investigación Ósea y de la Composición Corporal, Guadalajara, Mexico. dr.francisco.torres@icloud.com.
Pilar De la Peña-RodríguezMexican Association of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (AMMOM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Roberto Enrique López-CervantesMexican Association of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (AMMOM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Jorge Morales-TorresMexican Association of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (AMMOM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Jorge Morales-VargasMexican Association of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (AMMOM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Hugo Gutiérrez-HermosilloMexican Association of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (AMMOM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Alan Christopher Guzmán-RicoCentro de Investigación Ósea y de la Composición Corporal, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Roberto Gabriel González-MendozaInstitute of Applied Sciences for Physical Activity and Sport, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Education, Sport, Recreation and Dance, University Health Sciences Center, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Pedro Nel Rueda PlataInstituto Endocrinológico de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia.
Miguel Flores CastroNational College of Geriatric Medicine (CONAMEGER), Mexico City, Mexico.
Cuauhtémoc Celis GonzalezMexican Federation of Colleges of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FEMECOG), Mexico City, Mexico.
Rolando Espinosa MoralesMexican Association of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (AMMOM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Sergio Quintero HernándezMexican Federation of Colleges of Orthopedics and Traumatology (FEMECOT), Guadalajara, Mexico.
Juan Ricardo López-TaylorInstitute of Applied Sciences for Physical Activity and Sport, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Education, Sport, Recreation and Dance, University Health Sciences Center, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Asociación Mexicana de Psicología y Desarrollo Comunitario · MXUniversidad de Guadalajara · MXInstituto Nacional de Rehabilitación · MXInstituto Neurológico de Colombia · CONational College · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection by SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) has affected practically all the world. This joint position statement of Latin American Medical Societies provides an updated guide for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporotic patients in the face of possible clinical scenarios posed by the COVID-19 health crisis.

backgroundInfection by SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) has affected practically all the world. Characterized by high contagiousness, significative morbidity, and mortality in a segment of those infected, it has overwhelmed health services and forced to redirect resources to the emergency while impacting the attention of acute non-COVID-19 and many chronic conditions.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to provide an updated guide for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporotic patients in the face of possible clinical scenarios posed by the COVID-19 health crisis.

methodsA task force, of bone specialists with a wide range of disciplines in the field of osteoporosis and fragility fracture, was convened with the representation of several professional associations, namely, the Mexican Association of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (AMMOM), the National College of Geriatric Medicine (CONAMEGER), the Latin American Federation of Endocrinology (FELAEN), the Mexican Federation of Colleges of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FEMECOG), the Mexican Federation of Colleges of Orthopedics and Traumatology (FEMECOT), and the Institute of Applied Sciences for Physical Activity and Sports of the University of Guadalajara (ICAAFYD). Clinical evidence was collated, and an evidence report was rapidly generated and disseminated. After finding the gaps in the available evidence, a consensus opinion of experts was made. The resulting draft was reviewed and modified accordingly, in 4 rounds, by the participants.

resultsThe task force approved the initial guidance statements, with moderate and high consensus. These were combined, resulting in the final guidance statements on the (1) evaluation of fracture risk; (2) stratification of risk priorities; (3) indications of bone density scans and lab tests; (4) initiation and continuation of pharmacologic therapy; (5) interruptions of therapy; (6) treatment of patients with incident fracture; (7) physical therapy and fall prevention; and (8) nutritional interventions.

conclusionThese guidance statements are provided to promote optimal care to patients at risk for osteoporosis and fracture, during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, given the low level of available evidence and the rapidly evolving literature, this guidance is presented as a "living document" and future updates are anticipated.

Indexed as

COVID-19MedicineOrthopedicsOsteoporosisTraumatologyAgedHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Fragility fractureOsteoporosisSARS-CoV-2Statement

Identifiers

PMID33495916
PMCPMC7833891
OpenAlexW3124085757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.