Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33495882›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2021

[Process management in surgery].

C Kahlert, M Janda, J Weitz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C KahlertKlinik für Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. christoph.kahlert@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
M JandaKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, der Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland.
J WeitzKlinik für Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Process management is defined as the concept of identifying processes in a company or healthcare organization, analyzing them and improving productivity and efficiency. In hospitals, process management focuses on patient safety, an increase in economic resources and employee satisfaction. The integration of process management into clinical pathways helps to accelerate workflows and to improve the quality of patient service. The different types of process management encompass the radical concept of process renewal (revolutionary renewal) as well as the concept of evolutionary optimization. Process management in surgery is applied to preoperative, perioperative and postoperative procedures. The development and implementation of evidence-based treatment pathways can help to standardize and structure treatment processes in a surgical department. In this context, the operating room (OR) plays a particularly central role as the most important part of the healthcare provision of perioperative services. Process management is indispensable for the utilization of an optimal OR capacity taking a maximum patient safety and the desired optimal satisfaction of employees into account. The benefits of process management in the OR area are illustrated in an exemplary case study, demonstrating how innovative process management results in an increase of the operation capacity with a simultaneous reduction in costs.

Indexed as

Operating RoomsHumansEmployee satisfactionEvidence-based medicineIncreased capacityOperation managementStandardization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.