ArticleSustainability science2021
A path forward for qualitative research on sustainability in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Sustainability science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- COVID-19 stress and coping strategies among older adults: a systematic review of qualitative evidences.BMC psychology · 2023Pooled it
- Community-Level Experiences, Understandings, and Responses to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Ethnographic Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- How the COVID-19 pandemic changed stakeholder engagement processes in sustainability research in the long-term.F1000Research · 2024Article
- Using telepresence robots as a tool to engage patient and family partners in dementia research during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative participatory study.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Developmental evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Practice-based learnings from projects in British Columbia, Canada.Evaluation journal of Australasia · 2023Article
- Gerontological social workers' perspectives about the future at the start of a COVID-19 vaccination program: A photovoice study.Journal of social work (London, England) · 2023Article
- Twelve tips for adopting the virtual Nominal Group Technique (vNGT) in medical education research.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2023Article
- [Joint interpretation work in qualitative health research in times of "physical distancing"].Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen · 2022Article
- Participatory research in times of COVID-19 and beyond: Adjusting your methodological toolkits.One earth (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Review
- Critical Reflections on Conducting Qualitative Health Research During COVID-19: The Lived Experiences of a Cohort of Postgraduate Students in a South African University.International journal of qualitative methodsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The unique strengths of qualitative research, through in-depth inquiry and identification of unexpected themes and linkages, is essential to our growing understanding of COVID-19's impacts on the social world and its intersection with sustainability science. However, many challenges-physical, psychological, and ethical in nature-face qualitative researchers during the pandemic, as social distancing and travel restrictions prevent in-person field work. In this paper, we outline the essential contributions of qualitative study to sustainability science, discuss current challenges, and in turn, provide recommendations for researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.