Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33495651›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2021

Ferroptosis: mechanisms, biology and role in disease.

Xuejun Jiang, Brent R Stockwell, Marcus Conrad

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4,156 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4,156citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
617.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4,156 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6,790 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. IntratumorGut microbes · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. FTO-mediated mRNA biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Emerging microbes & infections · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

4,096 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Xuejun JiangCell Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. jiangx@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8670-3828
Brent R StockwellDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. bstockwell@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3532-3868
Marcus ConradInstitute of Metabolism and Cell Death, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany. marcus.conrad@helmholtz-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1140-5612
Columbia University · USHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Scientific ReagentsP01CA087497 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI PETRINI, JOHN HJ · 2000 to 2021
$35.4M
Defining the functions and translational potential of ferroptosisR35CA209896 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI STOCKWELL, BRENT R. · 2016 to 2022
$6.5M
Ferroptosis, Cellular Metabolism, and CancerR01CA204232 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI JIANG, XUEJUN · 2017 to 2025
$4.1M
Mechanisms and Function of Autophagy in CancerR01CA166413 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI JIANG, XUEJUN · 2013 to 2023
$3.9M
Development of ferroptosis inhibitors for Huntington DiseaseR33NS109407 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI STOCKWELL, BRENT R. · 2021 to 2022
$778k
Development of ferroptosis inhibitors for Huntington DiseaseR61NS109407 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI STOCKWELL, BRENT R. · 2019 to 2019
$400k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA087497NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166413NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204232NCI NIH HHS R35 CA209896NINDS NIH HHS R33 NS109407NINDS NIH HHS R61 NS109407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The research field of ferroptosis has seen exponential growth over the past few years, since the term was coined in 2012. This unique modality of cell death, driven by iron-dependent phospholipid peroxidation, is regulated by multiple cellular metabolic pathways, including redox homeostasis, iron handling, mitochondrial activity and metabolism of amino acids, lipids and sugars, in addition to various signalling pathways relevant to disease. Numerous organ injuries and degenerative pathologies are driven by ferroptosis. Intriguingly, therapy-resistant cancer cells, particularly those in the mesenchymal state and prone to metastasis, are exquisitely vulnerable to ferroptosis. As such, pharmacological modulation of ferroptosis, via both its induction and its inhibition, holds great potential for the treatment of drug-resistant cancers, ischaemic organ injuries and other degenerative diseases linked to extensive lipid peroxidation. In this Review, we provide a critical analysis of the current molecular mechanisms and regulatory networks of ferroptosis, the potential physiological functions of ferroptosis in tumour suppression and immune surveillance, and its pathological roles, together with a potential for therapeutic targeting. Importantly, as in all rapidly evolving research areas, challenges exist due to misconceptions and inappropriate experimental methods. This Review also aims to address these issues and to provide practical guidelines for enhancing reproducibility and reliability in studies of ferroptosis. Finally, we discuss important concepts and pressing questions that should be the focus of future ferroptosis research.

Indexed as

AnimalsFerroptosisGene Regulatory NetworksHumansLipid PeroxidationNeoplasmsOxidation-ReductionReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID33495651
PMCPMC8142022
OpenAlexW3123922203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.