ArticleThe Journal of antibiotics2021
In vitro and in vivo antibacterial properties of peptide AMC-109 impregnated wound dressings and gels.
Article in The Journal of antibiotics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discovery and Development of Voxvoganan: First-in-Class Synthetic Antimicrobial Peptidomimetic.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Structural Modification and Conjugation Strategies of Antimicrobial Peptides for Topical Anti-Infective Applications.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lack of Spontaneous and Adaptive Resistance Development inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multiple-Layer Chitosan-Based Patches Medicated With LTX-109 Antimicrobial Peptide for Modulated Local Therapy in the Management of Chronic Wounds.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- PreventingACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Lateral membrane organization as target of an antimicrobial peptidomimetic compound.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Challenges and innovations in treating chronic and acute wound infections: from basic science to clinical practice.Burns & trauma · 2022Review
- Antimicrobial Peptide Mimics for Clinical Use: Does Size Matter?Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synthetic mimics of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) is a promising class of molecules for a variety of antimicrobial applications. Several hurdles must be passed before effective systemic infection therapies with AMPs can be achieved, but the path to effective topical treatment of skin, nail, and soft tissue infections appears less challenging to navigate. Skin and soft tissue infection is closely coupled to the emergence of antibiotic resistance and represents a major burden to the healthcare system. The present study evaluates the promising synthetic cationic AMP mimic, AMC-109, for treatment of skin infections in vivo. The compound is evaluated both in impregnated cotton wound dressings and in a gel formulation against skin infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistant S. aureus. Both the ability to prevent colonization and formation of an infection, as well as eradicate an ongoing infection in vivo with a high bacterial load, were evaluated. The present work demonstrates that AMC-109 displays a significantly higher antibacterial activity with up to a seven-log reduction in bacterial loads compared to current clinical standard therapy; Altargo cream (1% retapamulin) and Fucidin cream (2% fusidic acid) in the in vivo wound models. It is thus concluded that AMC-109 represents a promising entry in the development of new and effective remedies for various skin infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.