Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33495548›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Motor engagement relates to accurate perception of phonemes and audiovisual words, but not auditory words.

Kelly Michaelis, Makoto Miyakoshi, Gina Norato, Andrei V Medvedev, Peter E Turkeltaub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelly MichaelisCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3648-3142
Makoto MiyakoshiSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Gina NoratoClinical Trials Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Andrei V MedvedevCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Peter E TurkeltaubCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. turkeltp@georgetown.edu.

Funding

Cross-frequency coupling: its role in brain function and dysfunctionRF1MH123192 · NIMH · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MEDVEDEV, ANDREI V · 2020 to 2020
$840k
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH123192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A longstanding debate has surrounded the role of the motor system in speech perception, but progress in this area has been limited by tasks that only examine isolated syllables and conflate decision-making with perception. Using an adaptive task that temporally isolates perception from decision-making, we examined an EEG signature of motor activity (sensorimotor μ/beta suppression) during the perception of auditory phonemes, auditory words, audiovisual words, and environmental sounds while holding difficulty constant at two levels (Easy/Hard). Results revealed left-lateralized sensorimotor μ/beta suppression that was related to perception of speech but not environmental sounds. Audiovisual word and phoneme stimuli showed enhanced left sensorimotor μ/beta suppression for correct relative to incorrect trials, while auditory word stimuli showed enhanced suppression for incorrect trials. Our results demonstrate that motor involvement in perception is left-lateralized, is specific to speech stimuli, and it not simply the result of domain-general processes. These results provide evidence for an interactive network for speech perception in which dorsal stream motor areas are dynamically engaged during the perception of speech depending on the characteristics of the speech signal. Crucially, this motor engagement has different effects on the perceptual outcome depending on the lexicality and modality of the speech stimulus.

Indexed as

AdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleSensorimotor CortexSpeech PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33495548
PMCPMC7835217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.