Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33495387›Full record

SynthesisRMD open2021

Multidisciplinary team intervention to reduce the nocebo effect when switching from the originator infliximab to a biosimilar.

Juliette Petit, Marie Antignac, Rose-Marie Poilverd, Régine Baratto, Sylvie Darthout, Sandra Desouches, Karine Louati, Nathalie Deparis, Francis Berenbaum, Catherine Beauvais

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in RMD open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juliette PetitRheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France juliettelouisepetit@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8861-6819
Marie AntignacPharmacy, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.
Rose-Marie PoilverdRheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Régine BarattoRheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Sylvie DarthoutRheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Sandra DesouchesRheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Karine LouatiRheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Nathalie DeparisAssociation ANDAR (Association Nationale de Défense Contre l'Arthrite Rhumatoïde), Paris, France.
Francis BerenbaumRheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Catherine BeauvaisRheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université · FRAssociation Française de Lutte Anti-Rhumastismale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate an intervention to reduce the nocebo effect (NE) when switching from the originator infliximab (OI) to the infliximab biosimilar SB2 in chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease (CIRD).

methodsAn intervention was built with healthcare professionals (HPs) and a patient representative, based on a systematic review of interventions reducing the NE in musculoskeletal diseases and semi-directed questioning of five patients. Our strategy consisted of training HPs, switch information given by the nurses, a consistent vocabulary. All CIRD patients switched from OI to SB2 were included for the intervention. The primary outcome was the SB2 retention rate (RR) at 34 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the SB2 RR at 12 months, discontinuation rates due to a possible NE and comparison with a historical cohort of CIRD patients receiving the OI and 6 published European cohorts.

results45 patients were included from March 2018 (rheumatoid arthritis, n=17, spondylarthritis, n=28). After 34 weeks, the SB2 RR was 91.2%, similar to the historical cohort RR (p=0.41) but higher than the 3 European cohort RRs (p<0.05). At 12 months, the SB2 RR was 84.5% vs 88.4% for the historical cohort (p=0.52). SB2 discontinuation due to a possible NE was 6.6% after 12 months.

conclusionsA tailored communication with a prominent role of nurses reduced the NE in non-medical switches from the OI to SB2 as compared to published results. The RR was similar to the historical cohort RR. The methodology used to construct this intervention may help improve the outcomes of switches with upcoming biosimilars.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsHumansInfliximabNocebo EffectPatient Care TeamBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsInfliximabAnkylosingArthritisatient Care TeamBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsInfliximabRheumatoidSpondylitis

Identifiers

PMID33495387
PMCPMC7839879
OpenAlexW3122547945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.