Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33495257›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2021

Effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in adult patients undergoing dental procedures: a systematic review.

Jimmy de Oliveira Araújo, Cristiane de Cássia Bergamaschi, Luciane Cruz Lopes, Caio Chaves Guimarães, Natalia Karol de Andrade, Juliana Cama Ramacciato, Rogério Heládio Lopes Motta

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The median effective dose (EDBMC anesthesiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jimmy de Oliveira AraújoDivision of Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Therapeutics, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil.
Cristiane de Cássia BergamaschiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade da Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6608-1806
Luciane Cruz LopesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade da Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3684-3275
Caio Chaves GuimarãesDivision of Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Therapeutics, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1672-528X
Natalia Karol de AndradeDivision of Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Therapeutics, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil.
Juliana Cama RamacciatoDivision of Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Therapeutics, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil.
Rogério Heládio Lopes MottaDivision of Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Therapeutics, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil rogerio.motta@slmandic.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0002-6983-7883
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic · BRUniversidade de Sorocaba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIt can be challenging to manage patients who are anxious during dental procedures. There is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in adults. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in patients undergoing dental procedures.

designSystematic review.

methodsRandomised clinical trials (RCTs) compared the oral use of benzodiazepines and other medications with a placebo or other oral agents in adult patients. A search of the Cochrane (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (via Ovid) databases was conducted, without any restrictions on language or date of publication. The primary outcomes included the adverse effects and anxiety level. The secondary outcomes included sedation, satisfaction with the treatment, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation. Reviewers, independently and in pairs, assessed each citation for eligibility, performed the data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. A narrative synthesis of the data was provided.

resultsA number of RCTs (n=327 patients) assessed the use of benzodiazepines (n=9) and herbal medicines (n=3). We found good satisfaction with treatment after the use of midazolam 7.5 mg or clonidine 150 µg and reduced anxiety with alprazolam (0.5 and 0.75 mg). Midazolam 15 mg promoted greater anxiety reduction than

conclusionsGiven the limitations of the findings due to the quality of the included studies and the different comparisons made between interventions, further RCTs are required to confirm the effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in dentistry. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017057142.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaMidazolamAdultAlprazolamBenzodiazepinesDiazepamHumansAlprazolamBenzodiazepinesDiazepamMidazolamclinical pharmacologyhealth & safetypublic health

Identifiers

PMID33495257
PMCPMC7839856
OpenAlexW3125487430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.