Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33495204›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2021

Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care.

Emilie Ferrat, Julie Fabre, Philippe Galletout, Emmanuelle Boutin, Julien Le Breton, Vincent Renard, Paul Frappé, Sylvie Bastuji-Garin

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoagulants and new insights into inappropriate dosing: results from the French National Prospective Registry: PAFF.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emilie FerratPrimary Care Department, School of Medicine, University of Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil; INSERM, IMRB, CEpiA Team (Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing), University of Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil.
Julie FabrePrimary Care Department, School of Medicine, University of Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil.
Philippe GalletoutPrimary Care Department, School of Medicine, University of Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil.
Emmanuelle BoutinUniversity of Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil; Clinical Research Unit (URC Mondor), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil.
Julien Le BretonPrimary Care Department, School of Medicine, University of Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil; INSERM, IMRB, CEpiA Team (Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing), University of Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil.
Vincent RenardPrimary Care Department, School of Medicine, University of Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil; INSERM, IMRB, CEpiA Team (Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing), University of Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil.
Paul FrappéDepartment of General Practice, University of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne.
Sylvie Bastuji-GarinUniversity of Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil; Department of Public Health, APHP, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil.
Université Paris-Est Créteil · FRParis-Est Sup · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) account for an increasing proportion of prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in primary care. Inappropriate dosing of DOACs is a common problem, with under-dosing being a particular issue. However, conflicting results have been reported about the factors independently associated with inappropriate dosing.

aimTo describe inappropriate prescriptions of DOACs among patients in the CACAO French nationwide general practice cohort, and to identify the factors independently associated with inappropriate DOAC doses. DESIGN AND

settingCross-sectional baseline analysis of the CACAO French national multicentre prospective cohort of adult patients in primary care receiving an oral anticoagulant who were recruited between April and October 2014.

methodA total of 1111 patients from the CACAO cohort who received a DOAC for NVAF were included in this study. Inappropriate prescriptions of DOACs were described (inappropriate dosage, contraindications, non-indications, interactions, and non-compliance with the precautions for use). Multivariate logistic models were used to investigate factors associated with inappropriate DOAC dosing (under-dosing and over-dosing).

resultsOverall, 438 patients (39.4%) received at least one inappropriate DOAC prescription. The most common inappropriate prescription was inappropriate dosage (

conclusionThe appropriateness of DOAC prescribing for NVAF can be improved, especially in older patients, and in patients with kidney failure, a higher risk of ischaemic stroke, and/or a higher risk of bleeding. GPs have a key role in increasing the proportion of appropriate DOAC prescriptions via informational, educational, and/or management strategies.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationBrain IschemiaStrokeAdministration, OralAdultAgedAnticoagulantsCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInappropriate PrescribingPrescriptionsPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesAnticoagulantsatrial fibrillationcohort studiesdirect oral anticoagulantsprescriptionprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID33495204
PMCPMC7846350
OpenAlexW3108176245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.