Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33494839›Full record

ReviewResearch involvement and engagement2021

Experiences of an HCV Patient engagement group: a seven-year journey.

UNC Chapel Hill HCV Patient Engagement Group, Scott Kixmiller, Anquenette P Sloan, Summer Wadsworth, Finton Brown, Lourdes Chaney, Larry Houston, Kim Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research involvement and engagement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

UNC Chapel Hill HCV Patient Engagement Group
Scott KixmillerPatient Engagement Group Member and Co-Author, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. scott.kixmiller@northstate.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7269-023X
Anquenette P SloanPatient Engagement Group Member and Co-Author, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Summer WadsworthPatient Engagement Group Member and Co-Author, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Finton BrownPatient Engagement Group Member and Co-Author, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lourdes ChaneyUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Larry HoustonPatient Engagement Group Member and Co-Author, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kim ThomasThe Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · US

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute HPC-1503-27891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, few publications exist where patient engagement in clinical studies is a driving force in study design and implementation. The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), established in 2010, employed a new model of integrating stakeholder perspectives into healthcare research. This manuscript aims to share the experience of a Patient Engagement Group (PEG) that has engaged in hepatitis C (HCV) clinical research alongside investigators conducting two studies funded by PCORI and to inspire others to get more involved in research that can impact our healthcare and health policies.There are many gaps in treating infectious diseases. Traditionally, treatment and research have been strictly clinical/medical approaches with little focus on the biopsychosocial aspects of individual patients. Our PEG reflected on its own personal experiences regarding how research design can affect study implementation by including patients who are normally excluded. We considered barriers to treatment, out of pocket costs, access to insurance, and patient race/ethnicity. Common themes were discovered, and four major topics were discussed. In addition, measures used in the two studies to collect patient data were considered, tested, and implemented by the group.We describe in detail how we were formed and how we have worked together with researchers on two PCORI funded projects over the past 7 years. We formulated and implemented guidelines and responsibilities for operating as a PEG as well as appointing a chair, co-chair, and primary author of this manuscript.Written from the perspective of a PEG whose members experienced HCV treatment and cure, we provide lessons learned, and implications for further research to include patients. PEGs like ours who are included as active partners in research can provide useful input to many areas including how patients are treated during clinical trials, how they interact with research teams, and how the clinical benefits of drugs or devices are defined and evaluated. PCORI believes engagement impacts research to be more patient-centered, useful, and trustworthy, and will ultimately lead to greater use and interest of research results by the patient and the broader healthcare community.

Indexed as

Drug trialsHealthcareHepatitis C (HCV)Infectious diseasesInsurance companiesMinority participationPatient centeredPatient centered research institute (PCORI)Patient engagement group (PEG)Research studies

Identifiers

PMID33494839
PMCPMC7830045
OpenAlexW3121491299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.