Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33494746›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

The association between men's family planning networks and contraceptive use among their female partners: an egocentric network study in Madagascar.

Alison B Comfort, Cynthia C Harper, Alexander C Tsai, Jessica M Perkins, James Moody, Justin Ranjalahy Rasolofomana, Cora Alperin, Margaret Schultz, Anja Noeliarivelo Ranjalahy, Ravo Heriniaina and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Alison B ComfortUniversity of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. Alison.comfort@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6713-5258
Cynthia C HarperUniversity of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Alexander C TsaiMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 125 Nashua Street, Suite 722, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Jessica M PerkinsPeabody College of Education and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, PMB 90, 230 Appleton Place, Nashville, TN, 37203-5721, USA.
James MoodyDuke University, 268 Soc/Psych Building, Durham, NC, 27708-0088, USA.
Justin Ranjalahy RasolofomanaInstitut National de Santé Publique et Communautaire, Ex-Ecole de Médecine de Befelatanana, BP 176, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Cora AlperinUniversity of Chicago, 5438 S Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60615, USA.
Margaret SchultzInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, Third Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Anja Noeliarivelo RanjalahyTANDEM SARL, Lot H 107, Merimanjaka, 102, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Ravo HeriniainaOpportunity Solutions International, Lot III G17, Ambalavao, Madagascar.
Paul J KrezanoskiOpportunity Solutions International, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USDuke University · USHarvard University · USOpportunity International · USSan Francisco General Hospital · USTandem Diabetes Care (United States) · USUniversity of Chicago · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Focused Training in Social Networks and HealthR25HD079352 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOODY, JAMES · 2015 to 2024
$1.6M
Identifying gaps between LLIN use and vector exposure to improve malaria controlK23AI139364 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KREZANOSKI, PAUL JOSEPH · 2019 to 2023
$986k
Perceptions of Social Norms and Personal Propensity to Engage in HIV Testing: A Mixed Methods Study and Intervention in Rural UgandaK01MH115811 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PERKINS, JESSICA M · 2018 to 2022
$857k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 1R25HD079352NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI139364NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD079352NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH115811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnsuring women have information, support and access to family planning (FP) services will allow women to exercise their reproductive autonomy and reduce maternal mortality, which remains high in countries such as Madagascar. Research shows that women's social networks - their ties with partners, family members, friends, and providers - affect their contraceptive use. Few studies have considered the role of men's social networks on women's contraceptive use. Insofar as women's contraceptive use may be influenced by their male partners, women's contraceptive use may also be affected by their partner's social networks. Men may differ by the types of ties they rely on for information and advice about FP. It is unknown whether differences in the composition of men's FP networks matter for couples' contraceptive use. This study assessed the association between men's FP networks and couples' contraceptive use.

methodsThis egocentric network study was conducted among married/partnered men (n = 178) in rural Madagascar. Study participants listed who they relied on for FP information and advice, including health providers and social ties. They provided ties' gender, age, relationship, and perceived support of contraceptive use. The primary outcome was couples' contraceptive use, and explanatory variables included FP networks and their composition (no FP network, social-only network, provider-only network, and mixed network of social and provider ties). Analyses used generalized linear models specifying a Poisson distribution, with covariate adjustment and cluster robust standard errors.

resultsMen who had FP networks were 1.9 times more likely to use modern contraception as a couple compared to men with no FP network (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-2.52; p ≤ 0.001). Compared to men with no FP network, men were more likely to use modern contraception if they had a social-only network, relative risk (RR) = 2.10 (95% CI, 1.65-2.68; p ≤ 0.001); a provider-only network, RR = 1.80 (95% CI, 1.54-2.11; p ≤ 0.001); or a mixed network, RR = 2.35 (95% CI, 1.97-2.80; p ≤ 0.001).

conclusionsWhether men have a FP network, be it provider or social ties, distinguishes if couples are using contraception. Interventions should focus on reaching men not only through providers but also through their social ties to foster communication and support for contraceptive use.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesContraceptionContraception BehaviorFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMadagascarMaleMenContraceptive AgentsCommunity health workersContraceptivesFamily planningHealth providersInfluencersMadagascarMale partnerReproductive healthSocial networksSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID33494746
PMCPMC7831255
OpenAlexW3121771074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.