ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2021
Quantitative Imaging and Radiomics in Multiple Myeloma: A Potential Opportunity?
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of ISS and R-ISS Stratification in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Using Lumbar Spine MRI Radiomics Model: A Two-Center Multimodal Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Bone mineral density assessment by DXA in disease-associated osteoporosis: the limitations.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Prognostic significance of FDG-PET/CT based radiomics analysis in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma: a comparative study with clinical assessment.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Role of Imaging in Multiple Myeloma: A Potential Opportunity for Quantitative Imaging and Radiomics?Cancers · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence-based application in multiple myeloma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Advances in estimating plasma cells in bone marrow: A comprehensive method review.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2024Review
- Myeloma Spine and Bone Damage Score (MSBDS) on Whole-Body Computed Tomography (WBCT): Multiple Reader Agreement in a Multicenter Reliability Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- CT-derived relationship between low relative muscle mass and bone damage in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing stem cells transplantation.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Imaging in multiple myeloma: Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging?World journal of radiology · 2021Article
- Radiomic Analysis of Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Images to Differentiate between Multiple Myeloma and Skeletal Metastases.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple Myeloma (MM) is the second most common type of hematological disease and, although it is rare among patients under 40 years of age, its incidence rises in elderly subjects. MM manifestations are usually identified through hyperCalcemia, Renal failure, Anaemia, and lytic Bone lesions (CRAB). In particular, the extent of the bone disease is negatively related to a decreased quality of life in patients and, in general, bone disease in MM increases both morbidity and mortality. The detection of lytic bone lesions on imaging, especially computerized tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), is becoming crucial from the clinical viewpoint to separate asymptomatic from symptomatic MM patients and the detection of focal lytic lesions in these imaging data is becoming relevant even when no clinical symptoms are present. Therefore, radiology is pivotal in the staging and accurate management of patients with MM even in early phases of the disease. In this review, we describe the opportunities offered by quantitative imaging and radiomics in multiple myeloma. At the present time there is still high variability in the choice between various imaging methods to study MM patients and high variability in image interpretation with suboptimal agreement among readers even in tertiary centers. Therefore, the potential of medical imaging for patients affected by MM is still to be completely unveiled. In the coming years, new insights to study MM with medical imaging will derive from artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics usage in different bone lesions and from the wide implementations of quantitative methods to report CT and MRI. Eventually, medical imaging data can be integrated with the patient's outcomes with the purpose of finding radiological biomarkers for predicting the prognostic flow and therapeutic response of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.