Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33494405›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Potential Physiological Relevance of ERAD to the Biosynthesis of GPI-Anchored Proteins in Yeast.

Kunio Nakatsukasa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kunio NakatsukasaGraduate School of Science, Nagoya City University, Yamanohata 1, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8501, Japan.
Nagoya City University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 15K18503Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K19306Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H02923Toray Science Foundation 17-5808Toyoaki Scholarship Foundation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Misfolded and/or unassembled secretory and membrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) may be retro-translocated into the cytoplasm, where they undergo ER-associated degradation, or ERAD. The mechanisms by which misfolded proteins are recognized and degraded through this pathway have been studied extensively; however, our understanding of the physiological role of ERAD remains limited. This review describes the biosynthesis and quality control of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins and briefly summarizes the relevance of ERAD to these processes. While recent studies suggest that ERAD functions as a fail-safe mechanism for the degradation of misfolded GPI-anchored proteins, several pieces of evidence suggest an intimate interaction between ERAD and the biosynthesis of GPI-anchored proteins.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated DegradationProtein BiosynthesisBiosynthetic PathwaysGPI-Linked ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsGPI-Linked ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCa2+/Mn2+ P-type ATPaseDoa10ERADGPI-anchored proteinHrd1Saccharomyces cerevisiaeUbc6Ubc7

Identifiers

PMID33494405
PMCPMC7865462
OpenAlexW3125743509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.