Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33494318›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Local Treatment of Burns with Cell-Based Therapies Tested in Clinical Studies.

Anna Paulina Domaszewska-Szostek, Marta Olga Krzyżanowska, Anna Maria Czarnecka, Maria Siemionow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Advances in Translational Regenerative Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna Paulina Domaszewska-SzostekDepartment of Human Epigenetics, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawińskiego St, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
Marta Olga KrzyżanowskaDivision of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Department of Ophthalmology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Anna Maria CzarneckaDepartment of Neurotoxicology, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawińskiego Street, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4235-2963
Maria SiemionowDepartment of Orthopaedics MC 944, University of Illinois at Chicago, 900 South Ashland Avenue, 3356 MCBRB, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective wound management is an important determinant of the survival and prognosis of patients with severe burns. Thus, novel techniques for timely and full closure of full-thickness burn wounds are urgently needed. The purpose of this review is to present the current state of knowledge on the local treatment of burn wounds (distinguishing radiation injury from other types of burns) with the application of cellular therapies conducted in clinical studies. PubMed search engine and ClinicalTrials.gov were used to analyze the available data. The analysis covered 49 articles, assessing the use of keratinocytes (30), keratinocytes and fibroblasts (6), fibroblasts (2), bone marrow-derived cells (8), and adipose tissue cells (3). Studies on the cell-based products that are commercially available (Epicel

Indexed as

adipose tissueburnsfibroblastskeratinocytesmesenchymal stem cellsradiation burns

Identifiers

PMID33494318
PMCPMC7864524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.