ArticleGenes2021
Multiple Alignment of Promoter Sequences from the
Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classification of Promoter Sequences from Human Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Search for Dispersed Repeats in Bacterial Genomes Using an Iterative Procedure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Detection of tandem repeats in the Capsicum annuum genome.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2023Article
- Article
- Database of Potential Promoter Sequences in theBiology · 2022Article
- Use of 6 Nucleotide Length Words to Study the Complexity of Gene Sequences from Different Organisms.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Developments in Algorithms for Sequence Alignment: A Review.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Application of the MAHDS Method for Multiple Alignment of Highly Diverged Amino Acid Sequences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Search for Highly Divergent Tandem Repeats in Amino Acid Sequences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we developed a new mathematical method for performing multiple alignment of highly divergent sequences (MAHDS), i.e., sequences that have on average more than 2.5 substitutions per position (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.