Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33494257›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2021

Reinforcement of Colonic Anastomosis with Improved Ultrafine Nanofibrous Patch: Experiment on Pig.

Jachym Rosendorf, Marketa Klicova, Lenka Cervenkova, Jana Horakova, Andrea Klapstova, Petr Hosek, Richard Palek, Jan Sevcik, Robert Polak, Vladislav Treska and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of single-nanofibrous materials for epidural scar prevention after laminectomy: An experimental study in an animal model.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jachym RosendorfBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Marketa KlicovaDepartment of Nonwovens and Nanofibrous Materials, Faculty of Textile Engineering, Technical University of Liberec, 460 01 Liberec, Czech Republic.
Lenka CervenkovaBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Jana HorakovaDepartment of Nonwovens and Nanofibrous Materials, Faculty of Textile Engineering, Technical University of Liberec, 460 01 Liberec, Czech Republic.
Andrea KlapstovaDepartment of Nonwovens and Nanofibrous Materials, Faculty of Textile Engineering, Technical University of Liberec, 460 01 Liberec, Czech Republic.
Petr HosekBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9359-4770
Richard PalekBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Jan SevcikBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Robert PolakBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Vladislav TreskaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Jiri ChvojkaDepartment of Nonwovens and Nanofibrous Materials, Faculty of Textile Engineering, Technical University of Liberec, 460 01 Liberec, Czech Republic.
Vaclav LiskaBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.

Funding

Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České Republiky NU20J-08-00009European Regional Development Fund CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007280Univerzita Karlova v Praze UNCE/MED/006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage is a dreadful complication in colorectal surgery. It has a negative impact on postoperative mortality, long term life quality and oncological results. Nanofibrous polycaprolactone materials have shown pro-healing properties in various applications before. Our team developed several versions of these for healing support of colorectal anastomoses with promising results in previous years. In this study, we developed highly porous biocompatible polycaprolactone nanofibrous patches. We constructed a defective anastomosis on the large intestine of 16 pigs, covered the anastomoses with the patch in 8 animals (Experimental group) and left the rest uncovered (Control group). After 21 days of observation we evaluated postoperative changes, signs of leakage and other complications. The samples were assessed histologically according to standardized protocols. The material was easy to work with. All animals survived with no major complication. There were no differences in intestinal wall integrity between the groups and there were no signs of anastomotic leakage in any animal. The levels of collagen were significantly higher in the Experimental group, which we consider to be an indirect sign of higher mechanical strength. The material shall be further perfected in the future and possibly combined with active molecules to specifically influence the healing process.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakageanastomotic patchcolorectal surgeryelectrospinningexperimentintestinal anastomosisnanofibrous materialsperitoneal adhesionspolycaprolactone

Identifiers

PMID33494257
PMCPMC7909771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.