Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33493781›Full record

ArticleJournal of health economics2021

Effects of employer-offered high-deductible plans on low-value spending in the privately insured population.

Brendan Rabideau, Matthew D Eisenberg, Rachel Reid, Neeraj Sood

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health economics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. PERSPECTIVE: A Path to Value-Based Insurance Design for Mental Health Services.The journal of mental health policy and economics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brendan RabideauDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Matthew D EisenbergDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States; Hopkins Business of Health Initiative, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Rachel ReidRAND Corporation, Boston, MA, United States; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Neeraj SoodPrice School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; NBER, United States; Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States. Electronic address: nsood@healthpolicy.usc.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

TRAINING IN HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCHT32HS000029 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DY, SYDNEY MORSS · 1987 to 2024
$8.3M
Integrating data for causal inference in behavioral healthT32MH122357 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rashelle Jean Musci, Elizabeth A. Stuart · 2020 to 2026
$1.8M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS000029NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH122357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enrollment in plans with high deductibles has increased more than seven-fold in the last decade. Proponents of these plans argue that high deductibles could reduce wasteful spending by providing patients with incentives to limit use of low-value services that offer little or no clinical benefit. Others are concerned that patients may respond to these incentives by reducing their use of medical services indiscriminately and regardless of clinical benefit, which may negatively impact health outcomes. This study uses individual-level insurance claims data (2008-2013) and plausibly exogenous changes in plan offerings within firms over time to estimate the intent-to-treat and local-average treatment effects of high-deductible plan offerings on spending on 24 low-value services received in the outpatient setting. We find that firm offer of a high-deductible plan leads to a 13.7% ($5.23) reduction in average enrollee spending on low-value outpatient services and a 5.2% ($105.77) reduction in overall outpatient spending. We also find reductions in spending on measures of low-value imaging and laboratory services. We find some evidence that offering high-deductible plans disproportionately reduces low-value spending relative to overall spending, indicating that deductibles may be a way to incentivize value-based decision making.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareDeductibles and CoinsuranceHumansInsurance, HealthIntentionDeductibleHDHPLow-value care

Identifiers

PMID33493781
PMCPMC7968441
OpenAlexW3118473234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.